Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth century — John Shaqi
Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth centuryRobertson, Eben William
History
Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth century
Robertson, Eben William
Scotland -- History -- To 1603
Upon the accession of a new monarch, he ascended the Sacred Stone,
preserved inviolate for such occasions, and was inaugurated in the
presence of the clergy and the laity by the principal bishop of the
nation. Originally it is probable that the Druids were the necessary
assistants on such occasions, their prerogatives passing to the clergy;
for Columba is said by his biographer, Adamnan, to have “ordained”
Aidan king of the Dalriads, an expression which cannot mean that
Aidan’s title to the royal dignity was based upon the authority of the
Abbot of Iona, but rather that the sanction of the sacerdotal order,
which appears to have been considered indispensable to all political
authority amongst the Celtic people from time immemorial, had been
transferred upon the fall of the old religion, from the Druidical
to the Christian priesthood.[35] Close to the _Ardrigh_, with his
right foot planted on the same stone of honour, stood the _Righdomna_
or _Tanist_, the heir-apparent of the monarchy, who seems to have
been nominated on the same occasion in pursuance of the true Celtic
principle of “a divided authority,” the office being immediately
filled up, in case of the premature death of the _Tanist_ during
the lifetime of the reigning sovereign--a fatality of very frequent
occurrence--the same rule being as applicable to the chieftain of the
smallest territory as to the chosen leader of the nation. The power of
the _Ardrigh_ over the provincial kings must have depended upon his
ability to enforce it, and to exact the hostages which were invariably
necessary to secure the obedience of the subordinate princes. _Can_ and
_Cuairt_, or tribute and visitation, were amongst his rightful dues;
in other words, in addition to the payment of a stipulated tribute,
the _Oirrighs_ were bound to entertain the _Ardrigh_ and his followers
in his annual progresses for a certain stated period in every year; a
burdensome system of free-quarters by no means peculiar to the Celtic
people, which could be exacted by every petty chieftain from the
occupants of all the territory over which his influence extended.[36]
The authority of the early Pictish kings over the various provinces of
the confederacy was probably identical with that of the Irish _Ardrigh_
over the subordinate principalities of _Leth Cuin_ and _Leth Mogh_, and
may be compared to the dominion exercised by Kent, Wessex, or Mercia,
over the remaining South Humbrian kingdoms, at a time when either
state was liable to exchange the situation of a ruling power for a
subordinate and comparatively dependent position.[37]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account