Screw-Thread Cutting by the Master-Screw Method since 1480Battison, Edwin A.
History
Screw-Thread Cutting by the Master-Screw Method since 1480
Battison, Edwin A.
Screw-cutting machines -- History
FRANK A. TAYLOR
_Director, United States National Museum_
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM
THE MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGY:
PAPER 37
SCREW-THREAD CUTTING BY THE
MASTER-SCREW METHOD SINCE 1480
_Edwin A. Battison_
_Edwin A. Battison_
SCREW-THREAD CUTTING BY THE MASTER-SCREW METHOD SINCE 1480
_Among the earliest known examples of screw-thread cutting machines
are the screw-cutting lathe of 1483, known only in pictures and
drawings, and an instrument of the traverse-spindle variety for
threading metal, now in the Smithsonian Institution, dating from the
late 17th or early 18th century. The author shows clearly their
evolution from something quite specialized to the present-day tool.
He has traced the patents for these instruments through the early
1930's and from this research we see the part played by such devices
in the development of the machine-tool industry._
THE AUTHOR: _Edwin A. Battison is associate curator of mechanical
and civil engineering in the Smithsonian Institution's Museum of
History and Technology._
Directness and simplicity characterize pioneer machine tools because
they were intended to accomplish some quite specialized task and the
need for versatility was not apparent. History does not reveal the
earliest forms of any primitive machines nor does it reveal much about
the various early stages in evolution toward more complex types. At best
we have discovered and dated certain developments as existing in
particular areas. Whether these forms were new at the time they were
first found or how widely dispersed such forms may have been is unknown.
Surviving evidence is in the form of pictures or drawings, such as the
little-known screw-cutting lathe of 1483 (fig. 1) shown in _Das
mittelalterliche Hausbuch_.
This lathe shows that its builder had a keen perception of the necessary
elements, reduced to bare essentials, required to accomplish the object.
Present are the coordinate slides often credited to Henry Maudslay. His
slides are not, of course, associated with the spindle; neither is there
any natural law which compels them to guide the tool exactly parallel
with the axis of revolution. In this sense the screw-cutting lathe in
the _Hausbuch_ is superior because it is in harmony with natural law and
can generate a true cylinder, whereas Maudslay's lathe can only transfer
to the work whatever accuracy is built into it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account