An important undertaking belongs to the year 1628. Miguel Cano had been
employed to erect a new high altar for the church at Lebrija, a small
town situated forty-five miles from Seville on the way to Jeréz. The
altar was already designed, but the actual carving was not started, when
Miguel Cano died. It fell to his son to complete the work. Four pieces
of sculpture were executed; a Crucifixion to be placed above the altar,
colossal statues of St. Paul and St. Peter for its second storey, and a
small and exquisite image of the Virgin enshrined within a curtained
niche above the slab of the altar. This last is perhaps the most
pleasing sculpture of this early period; it is one of those really
beautiful pieces which cause us to forgive much of Cano’s commonplace
work.
It was soon after this that Cano left Seville. He could not bear any
superior in his art except his master to be near him, and he challenged
a fellow-painter, Sebastian de Llano y Valdés, whose success had enraged
him. He stabbed and wounded him, and, to escape the action of the
ecclesiastical authorities, he fled to Madrid. Here he renewed his
friendship with Velazquez, and through his influence gained an
appointment to work in the royal palaces, besides having the honour of
being professor to Prince Baltasar Carlos.
During this period, and in the years that followed, Cano did more
painting than modelling, and we have many pictures from his hand, some
of which may be seen in the Prado Museum. In 1643 we find Cano at Toledo
soliciting work in the cathedral. He did not obtain it, and returned to
Madrid, where, soon afterwards, he was accused of murdering his wife.
This was the beginning of a period of turmoil and wandering. Cano fled
to the city of Valencia and afterwards took refuge in the Cartuja of
Portacali. But later on, returning to Madrid, he fell under the tribunal
of the Inquisition. After suffering the torture, he was adjudged
innocent of the crime with which he was charged, and appointed Majordomo
of the Brotherhood of Nuestra Señora de los Dolores. This was a source
of fresh trouble, and Cano was fined a sum of a hundred ducats for
refusing to assist in the procession in Holy Week beside the _alguazils_
of the court--a characteristic incident, for Cano was a man who never
crossed his own wishes. Cano again left Madrid, and we find him in
Toledo, employed by the chapter to inspect the works in the octagon
chapel. Afterwards he must have gone to Valencia and Malaga, then he
appears again at Madrid. But he seems to have sought an opportunity to
leave the royal city, and a canonry being vacant in the Cathedral of
Granada, he petitioned the post from Philip IV., which was granted by a
royal decree, dated September 11, 1651, under conditions that he should
take orders within a year. But the year passed and Cano was not
ordained, and his prebendaryship was declared vacant. Whereupon Cano,
who was still governed by self-will, took his grievance to the courts. A
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account