How is it, then, that sculpture is the branch of the national art least
known beyond the bounds of the country? Rare indeed are the writers who
have made a study of Spanish sculpture. A few good articles on the
subject have appeared in France and in Germany; in England none. Even in
Spain a quite inadequate attention has been given to this most important
branch of the national art. There are, it is true, several excellent
monographs, such as the works of D. José Gestoso y Perez on Pedro
Millan, and that of D. Manuel Serrano y Ortega on Montañés. Then there
is the very interesting study by D. José Marti y Monso on the artists of
Valladolid. But these writings were limited to one artist, or to the
works of one province. Until recently there was no work treating of
Spanish sculpture as a whole, except the _Diccionario_ of Cean Bermudez,
a book very excellent, but not free from error, and for the most part
unimportant in its critical estimates. Like most Spanish writers,
Bermudez praises work because it belongs to his own country, rather than
because of its true artistic worth. It is well that this indifference is
at an end. A critical study of Spanish carvings, entitled _La Statuaire
Polychrome en Espagne_, finely illustrated with beautiful examples of
the best carvings in the Peninsula, has now been written by M. Marcel
Dieulafoy. The book was published in Paris in 1908. We would take this
opportunity of gratefully acknowledging the help we have gained from
this excellent work.
But the question remains unanswered why the carvings of Spain have been
treated with such a want of interest. To find the answer it will be
necessary to consider briefly the circumstances which determined the
special character of Spanish sculpture.
Almost without exception statuary was executed for the religious uses of
the Catholic Church. Images were needed to increase the pious fervour of
the populace; they were used as altar decorations in the churches; often
they were carried in the religious processions; and many of them were
credited with miracle-working powers. The one thing necessary for a
Spanish statue was that it should be an exact imitation of life; the
more realistic the illusion the greater was the power of the statue to
fulfil the requirements of the Church.
It will readily be seen that marble--the substance most fitting for the
artistic rendering of form--would not comply with these demands. Thus
in Spain the classic marble was discarded, while wood and plaster were
employed in its place. These substances could be readily coloured, or
even covered with canvas resembling stone, and then painted to
counterfeit life. Thus out of the religious requirements--which in
Spain, so much more than in any other country, decided the expression of
art--was developed a natural employment of multi-colouring, whose
principle was the diversity of the various materials and the use of the
two arts of painting and sculpture in the same work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account