Se-quo-yah; from Harper's New Monthly, V.41 — John Shaqi
Se-quo-yah; from Harper's New Monthly, V.41Unknown
History
Se-quo-yah; from Harper's New Monthly, V.41
Unknown
Cherokee Indians; Sequoyah, 1770?-1843
Produced by Robert Rowe, Charles Franks and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team. HTML version by Al Haines.
SE-QUO-YAH.
From Harper's New Monthly, V. 41, 1870
In the year 1768 a German peddler, named George Gist, left the
settlement of Ebenezer, on the lower Savannah, and entered the Cherokee
Nation by the northern mountains of Georgia. He had two pack-horses
laden with the petty merchandise known to the Indian trade. At that
time Captain Stewart was the British Superintendent of the Indians in
that region. Besides his other duties, he claimed the right to regulate
and license such traffic. It was an old bone of contention. A few years
before, the Governor and Council of the colony of Georgia claimed the
sole power of such privilege and jurisdiction. Still earlier, the
colonial authorities of South Carolina assumed it. Traders from
Virginia, even, found it necessary to go round by Carolina and Georgia,
and to procure licenses. Augusta was the great centre of this commerce,
which in those days was more extensive than would be now believed.
Flatboats, barges, and pirogues floated the bales of pelts to
tide-water. Above Augusta, trains of pack-horses, sometimes numbering
one hundred, gathered in the furs, and carried goods to and from remote
regions. The trader immediately in connection with the Indian hunter
expected to make one thousand per cent. The wholesale dealer made
several hundred. The governors, councilors, and superintendents made
all they could. It could scarcely be called legitimate commerce. It was
a grab game.
Our Dutch friend Gist was, correctly speaking, a contrabandist. He had
too little influence or money to procure a license, and too much
enterprise to refrain because he lacked it. He belonged to a class more
numerous than respectable, although it would be a good deal to say that
there was any virtue in yielding to these petty exactions. It was a
mere question of confiscation, or robbery, without redress, by the
Indians. He risked it. With traders, at that time, it was customary to
take an Indian wife. She was expected to furnish the eatables, as well
as cook them. By the law of many Indian tribes property and the control
of the family go with the mother. The husband never belongs to the same
family connection, rarely to the same community or town even, and often
not even to the tribe. He is a sort of barnacle, taken in on his wife's
account. To the adventurer, like a trader, this adoption gave a sort of
legal status or protection. Gist either understood this before he
started on his enterprise, or learned it very speedily after. Of the
Cherokee tongue he knew positively nothing. He had a smattering of very
broken English. Somehow or other he managed to induce a Cherokee girl
to become his wife.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account