Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Philosophy
Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?
Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Diplomacy; Europe -- Politics and government
The fundamental American principle that treaties have the force and
status of law contains in itself the promise of solving some of the
worst troubles of the world, if it could be generally applied. America
should continue, for her own safety and that of the world, to use her
whole influence for making that principle a part of the universal
public law. No international engagement shall be binding unless
ratified by a representative body, and published to all the nations.
Otherwise it shall be absolutely void, and shall not give rise to
any rights or obligations; in fact, an attempt to make an agreement
contrary to these conditions shall be considered an act hostile to the
peace of the world. That should be the recognized law.
Nothing shows so clearly how human development has halted at this
point, as the fact that it should still require an argument to
show the necessity of publicity and lawfulness with respect to the
most essential interests of the vast populations that make up the
international family.
The record and constant practice of the United States, as well as her
great actual and potential power, fit her above all others to be a
leader in the establishment of this principle. The American nation
possesses a great moral capital in the confidence and trust that
the peoples of the world repose in it. No matter if unsympathetic
chanceries should plot to prevent America from making her influence
felt in the affairs of the world, no matter how European diplomacy
may occasionally sneer at American idealism, the peoples themselves,
great and small, including particularly those areas so immensely
important--Russia and China--would willingly look to America for
leadership and guidance, with complete trust and confidence. When this
is fully realized, we shall also be able to judge how vitally what
America stands for in the world will be strengthened by a constant
adherence to open and straightforward methods in international
intercourse.
But America herself, it will be said, cannot fundamentally change the
spirit that animates foreign policies, and bring about the universal
use of honest and open practices. We are living under a system which is
the result of historic forces that have not yet fully spent themselves
and which put the potential enmity among nations in the foreground.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account