Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Philosophy
Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?
Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Diplomacy; Europe -- Politics and government
I do not believe that it is necessary to shut our eyes to reality and
to seek recourse in a Utopian policy, in order to escape the menace
inherent in current international practices. If America will only not
fall in line with the absolutist tradition in diplomacy, but will
emphasize at all times, with all her influence, those principles of
international conduct which our natural freedom from entanglements
has permitted us to develop as of actual experience, America will
contribute in a most potent manner to the realization of that new
spirit which must surely come to deliver humanity. That spirit is not a
mere ideal,--it is fortunately already present in much of international
practice; but it needs constantly to be followed up and supported
in order that it may become the customary and instinctive guide,
superseding such prejudices as are still current which favor tortuous
manipulation and perpetuate an uninformed and confused state of the
public mind.
In order to fulfil this promise and destiny the United States would
have to rely in the first place on the inherent merit of her ideals
and principles of action, and on the support which they will receive
from the approval of the peoples of the world. As far as organized
governments go, as distinguished from the people, some will be more
inclined than others to coöperate with the United States in a reform
of international practice. There is no question but that the great
majority of governments will thus coöperate, though some of the most
important may for a time be left on the other side.
With those peoples and governments who are in language, political
traditions and general impulses most closely related to us, there
should grow up a particularly strong feeling of confidence making
all our intercourse absolutely open. There certainly need not be any
secrets between the United States and the great commonwealths of Canada
and Australia. Our interests, our condition, our institutions, all make
for the closest understanding. Through them there may be also realized
that harmony which ought by every normal reason to exist between the
United States and the English people, and which is disturbed only from
time to time when the policy of the British government is determined
more from the point of view of the supposed needs of the British Empire
in India, than of that of the true tradition of the English-speaking
world. I do not think of treaties or of alliances, but of something
much stronger--an intimate understanding among peoples, based on mutual
trust and confidence, and the consciousness of a common destiny, common
purposes, and a common belief in the things which alone will prevent
civilization from extinguishing itself in senseless hatreds.
CONCLUSION
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account