Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Philosophy
Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?
Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Diplomacy; Europe -- Politics and government
The abolition of secret diplomacy is not a matter of agreeing to
have no more secrets. It is a matter of arousing among the public so
powerful a determination to know, so strong a sentiment of the value of
truth, such a penetrating spirit of inquiry, that the secrets will fade
away as they always do when the importance of a situation is really
understood by a large number of people.
Meanwhile it need not appear futile to work for the positive
elimination of secrecy. No one can doubt that the provision of the
Covenant of the League of Nations, which requires that all treaties
shall be made public, is salutary and that its enforcement would
greatly increase public confidence. But it is necessary to go beyond
this and to outlaw any agreement which is kept secret, by making it the
public law of the world that no rights or obligations can be founded on
such attempts against the peace and common welfare of the nations.
The personal relationships of diplomacy also require attention. The
spirit of the Diplomatic Service should be transformed in accordance
with the modern organization of society. The most essential weakness
of caste diplomacy lies in the fact that it does not provide means
for a sufficient contact among the peoples of the world. Contact is
maintained only within a narrow class. The diplomatic fraternity lives
in its own realm of precedences, rivalries and traditions. To confine
the intercourse and interchange of influences so narrowly, is a great
weakness of our present political system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account