Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Philosophy
Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?
Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Diplomacy; Europe -- Politics and government
Lincoln’s simple faith in the people has not yet been adequately
applied in international affairs. International action has shown the
impersonal character of calculated manipulations coldly disposing of
the rights and lives of millions with cruel callousness. The last great
war has made us consider the relation of war sacrifices to the daily
welfare of the people. A great deal of the prevailing unrest in the
world is undoubtedly due to a lack of confidence that great affairs are
being handled with wisdom and with regard to the true, lasting welfare
of the people themselves. It is difficult to reduce to personal terms
relations so abstract and general as those obtaining in international
affairs. We think of the armies in serried ranks and are impressed
with the impact of their force and the great feats it may accomplish.
But we are too apt to forget the individual destiny carried in every
breast, the human feeling in every heart, among all the millions that
make up this engine of power and destruction. Human welfare rather than
human power has not yet been made the constant and overshadowing aim
of diplomacy. That will be done only when the people themselves demand
that international affairs shall be dealt with in a different spirit
and with other methods. Then we shall have policies that can be avowed
and understood by the people who bear the burden and who pay the bill.
The questions which we have been considering are not distinct and
isolated but are bound up with all that goes toward a more adequate
organization of modern society. Even in the industries, men are no
longer satisfied with a narrowly centralized control. They call for
information and accountability, they claim a share in management,
at least of an advisory or consultative nature. All who contribute
in bearing the risks of industry demand to be kept informed of the
policies and actions of the management. In ever extending circles
men share in the responsibility for action taken in their name.
It is a truism that risk is diminished and tends to disappear
as it is distributed over greater and greater numbers. Under our
present political system nations are carrying a tremendous risk in
international affairs--they are risking their wealth, the lives of
their citizens, their own very existence. The responsibility for
bearing these risks and for arranging the conditions of safety is now
too narrowly centralized. It is an elementary demand of safety that it
should be more widely distributed, that a larger number of competent
and representative minds should take part in carrying this burden.
And they should at all points be supported by a well-informed public
opinion throughout the nation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account