SECRET SOCIETIES A Discussion of Their Character and Claims by REV. DAVID MACDILL, JONATHAN BLANCHARD, D. D., AND EDWARD BEECHER, D. D. 'Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.' --EPH. v: 11. CONTENTS. I. A TREATISE BY REV. D. MACDILL. CHAPTER I. THEIR ANTIQUITY. CHAPTER II. THEIR SECRECY. CHAPTER III. OATHS AND PROMISES. CHAPTER IV. PROFANENESS. CHAPTER V. THEIR EXCLUSIVENESS. CHAPTER VI. FALSE CLAIMS. II. SHALL CHRISTIANS JOIN SECRET SOCIETIES? BY JONATHAN BLANCHARD, D. D. III. REPORT TO CONGREGATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS. BY EDWARD BEECHER, D. D. CHAPTER I. THEIR ANTIQUITY. 1. Secret associations are of very ancient origin. They existed among the ancient Egyptians, Hindoos, Grecians, Romans, and probably among nearly all the pagan nations of antiquity. This fact, however is neither proof of their utility nor of their harmlessness. Slavery, despotism, cruelty, drunken falsehood, and all sorts of sins and crimes have been practiced from time immemorial, but are none the less to be reprobated on that account. 2. The facts that these associations had no existence among the Israelites, who, alone of all the ancient nations, enjoyed the light of Divine revelation, and that they originated and flourished among the heathen, who were vain in their imaginations; whose foolish heart was darkened, and whom God gave up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts (Rom. i: 21-24), is a presumptive proof that their nature and tendency are evil. We do not claim that all the institutions among God's ancient people were right and good; nor that every institution among the heathen was sinful and injurious; still, that which was so popular among those whom the Bible declares to have been filled with all unrighteousness; that which was so pleasing to men whom God had given over to a reprobate mind and to vile affections (Rom. i: 26-28); that which made a part of the worship which the ignorant heathen offered up to their unclean gods, and which was unknown among God's chosen people, is certainly a thing to be viewed with suspicion. A thing of so bad origin and so bad accompaniments we should be very slow to approve. The fact that many good men see no evil in secret societies, and that many good men have been and are members of them, is more than counterbalanced by the fact that many good men very decidedly disapprove of them, and that, from time immemorial, men of vile affections and reprobate minds, men whose inclinations and consciences were perverted by heathenish ignorance and error, and by a corrupt and abominable religion, have been very fond of them.