Secret societies and subversive movementsWebster, Nesta Helen
History
Secret societies and subversive movements
Webster, Nesta Helen
Secret societies
Such, then, is the Association's continual mode of progression from
its origins until the present moment; it is by conveying from
childhood the germ of poison into the highest classes of society,
in feeding the minds of students on ideas diametrically opposed to
that order of things under which they have to live, in breaking the
ties that bind them to sovereigns, that Illuminism has recruited
the largest number of adepts, called by the state to which they
were born to be the mainstays of the Throne and of a system which
would ensure them honours and privileges.
Amongst the proselytes of this last class there are some no doubt
whom political events, the favour of the prince or other
circumstances, detach from the Association; but the number of these
deserters is necessarily very limited: and even then they dare not
speak openly against their old associates, whether because they are
in dread of private vengeances or whether because, knowing the real
power of the sect, they want to keep paths of reconciliation open
to themselves; often indeed they are so fettered by the pledges
they have personally given that they find it necessary not only to
consider the interests of the sect, but to serve it indirectly,
although their new circumstances demand the contrary....
Berckheim then proceeds to show that those writers on Illuminism were
mistaken who declared that political assassinations were definitely
commanded by the Order:
There is more than exaggeration in this accusation; those who put
it forward, more zealous in striking an effect than in seeking the
truth, may have concluded, not without probability, that men who
surrounded themselves with profound mystery, who propagated a
doctrine absolutely subversive of any kind of monarchy, dreamt only
of the assassination of sovereigns; but experience has shown (and
all the documents derived from the least suspect sources confirm
this) that the _Illuminés_ count a great deal more on the power of
opinion than on assassination; the regicide committed on Gustavus
III is perhaps the only crime of this kind that Illuminism has
dared to attempt, if indeed it is really proved that this crime was
its work; moreover, if assassination had been, as it is said, the
fundamental point in its doctrine, might we not suppose that other
regicides would have been attempted in Germany during the course of
the French Revolution, especially when the Republican armies
occupied the country?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account