Secrets of the Late Rebellion, Now Revealed for the First TimeFreese, Jacob R.
History
Secrets of the Late Rebellion, Now Revealed for the First Time
Freese, Jacob R.
United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
Meanwhile the children on both sides only seemed the more determined
to win finally, the oftener they were defeated temporarily; and
criminations and recriminations became harsher and fiercer on both
sides. The children of the North sided with the father, and claimed that
the letter of the original contract must be kept; that in that contract
there was no provision for divorce, nor was it admissible now. The
children of the South sided with the mother, and claimed that the
father had ill-treated the mother, had outgrown the mother, because of
advantages taken of her, and by every law, human and divine, she was
entitled to a divorce. The children of the North claimed that even if
a legal divorce was possible, an equitable division of the estate was
impossible. That a considerable portion of the estate had been purchased
with blood, or treasure, or both, since marriage, and was so located
that division was impossible; that Texas, California, and New Mexico
had cost thousands of lives and one hundred and thirty-five millions
of dollars, and could not now be divided; that Louisiana and the
free navigation of the Mississippi River had cost fifteen millions of
dollars, and could not now be divided; that Florida had been purchased
of Spain at a cost of six million dollars, and that it had cost
twenty-five millions more to get the Seminole Indians out of its swamps,
and that it could not now be divided. To all this the children of the
South replied, that not only what the mother had brought to the estate,
but all that had been since obtained, contiguous to that which she had
before marriage, belonged of right to her and her alone, and that they
would maintain her in this right against all comers: The children of the
North further complained that over three millions of the children of the
common household were held in bondage by Southern masters, and that they
must be liberated ere we could hope to have permanent peace at home, or
the respect of nations abroad. The children of the South replied that
those held in bondage were the descendants of Ham, whom Noah, with God's
approval, assigned to perpetual bondage to the sons of Shem and Japhet.
To this the children of the North replied that the New Dispensation of
Christ, teaching forgiveness to all, kindness to all, love to all, had
done away with the Old Dispensation of "an eye for an eye and a tooth
for a tooth," and that the command, "Come unto me all ye ends of the
earth," included the black man no less than the white. The children of
the South replied that they had not brought slavery into the family, nor
would they drive it out, and if others of the household attempted to do
so, they would maintain it; and thus, too, this question stood up to the
time mentioned in the opening of this chapter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account