Rome -- History -- Tiberius, 14-37 -- Drama; Sejanus, Lucius Aelius, -31 -- Drama; Tragedies (Drama)
It was this character, Captain Tucca, that Dekker hit upon in his
reply, “Satiromastix,” and he amplified him, turning his abusive
vocabulary back upon Jonson and adding “An immodesty to his dialogue
that did not enter into Jonson’s conception.” It has been held,
altogether plausibly, that when Dekker was engaged professionally, so
to speak, to write a dramatic reply to Jonson, he was at work on a
species of chronicle history, dealing with the story of Walter Terill
in the reign of William Rufus. This he hurriedly adapted to include the
satirical characters suggested by “Poetaster,” and fashioned to convey
the satire of his reply. The absurdity of placing Horace in the court
of a Norman king is the result. But Dekker’s play is not without its
palpable hits at the arrogance, the literary pride, and
self-righteousness of Jonson-Horace, whose “ningle” or pal, the absurd
Asinius Bubo, has recently been shown to figure forth, in all
likelihood, Jonson’s friend, the poet Drayton. Slight and hastily
adapted as is “Satiromastix,” especially in a comparison with the
better wrought and more significant satire of “Poetaster,” the town
awarded the palm to Dekker, not to Jonson; and Jonson gave over in
consequence his practice of “comical satire.” Though Jonson was cited
to appear before the Lord Chief Justice to answer certain charges to
the effect that he had attacked lawyers and soldiers in “Poetaster,”
nothing came of this complaint. It may be suspected that much of this
furious clatter and give-and-take was pure playing to the gallery. The
town was agog with the strife, and on no less an authority than
Shakespeare (“Hamlet,” ii. 2), we learn that the children’s company
(acting the plays of Jonson) did “so berattle the common stages...that
many, wearing rapiers, are afraid of goose-quills, and dare scarce come
thither.”
Several other plays have been thought to bear a greater or less part in
the war of the theatres. Among them the most important is a college
play, entitled “The Return from Parnassus,” dating 1601-02. In it a
much-quoted passage makes Burbage, as a character, declare: “Why here’s
our fellow Shakespeare puts them all down; aye and Ben Jonson, too. O
that Ben Jonson is a pestilent fellow; he brought up Horace, giving the
poets a pill, but our fellow Shakespeare hath given him a purge that
made him bewray his credit.” Was Shakespeare then concerned in this war
of the stages? And what could have been the nature of this “purge”?
Among several suggestions, “Troilus and Cressida” has been thought by
some to be the play in which Shakespeare thus “put down” his friend,
Jonson. A wiser interpretation finds the “purge” in “Satiromastix,”
which, though not written by Shakespeare, was staged by his company,
and therefore with his approval and under his direction as one of the
leaders of that company.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account