Select works of Porphyry : $b Containing his four books on abstinence from animal food; his treatise on the Homeric cave of the nymphs; and his Auxiliaries to the perception of intelligible natures. With an appendix, explaining the allegory of the wandering of UlyssesPorphyry
Religion
Select works of Porphyry : $b Containing his four books on abstinence from animal food; his treatise on the Homeric cave of the nymphs; and his Auxiliaries to the perception of intelligible natures. With an appendix, explaining the allegory of the wandering of Ulysses
Porphyry
Mind and body -- Early works to 1800; Neoplatonism -- Early works to 1800; Odysseus, King of Ithaca (Mythological character); Soul -- Early works to 1800; Vegetarianism -- Early works to 1800
19. But some one may, perhaps, say it is not proper to destroy that which
belongs to the same tribe with ourselves; if the souls of animals are
of the same essence with ourselves. If, however, it should be granted
that souls are inserted in bodies voluntarily, it must be said that it
is through a love of juvenility: for in the season of youth there is an
enjoyment of all things. Why, therefore, do they not again enter into
the nature of man? But if they enter voluntarily, and for the sake of
juvenility, and pass through every species of animals, they will be much
gratified by being destroyed. For thus their return to the human form
will be more rapid. The bodies also which are eaten will not produce any
pain in the souls of those bodies, in consequence of the souls being
liberated from them; and they will love to be implanted in the nature
of man. Hence, as much as they are pained on leaving the human form,
so much will they rejoice when they leave other bodies. For thus they
will more swiftly become man again, who predominates over all irrational
animals, in the same manner as God does over men. There is, therefore, a
sufficient cause for destroying other animals, viz. their acting unjustly
in destroying men. But if the souls of men are immortal, but those of
irrational animals mortal, men will not act unjustly by destroying
irrational animals. And if the souls of brutes are immortal, we shall
benefit them by liberating them from their bodies. For, by killing them,
we shall cause them to return to the human nature.
20. If, however, we [only] defend ourselves [in putting animals to
death], we do not act unjustly, but we take vengeance on those that
injure us. Hence, if the souls of brutes are indeed immortal, we benefit
them by destroying them. But if their souls are mortal, we do nothing
impious in putting them to death. And if we defend ourselves against
them, how is it possible that in so doing we should not act justly. For
we destroy, indeed, a serpent and a scorpion, though they do not attack
us, in order that some other person may not be injured by them; and in so
doing we defend the human race in general. But shall we not act justly in
putting those animals to death, which either attack men, or those that
associate with men, or injure the fruits of the earth?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account