Selected papers on hysteria and other psychoneurosesFreud, Sigmund
Science
Selected papers on hysteria and other psychoneuroses
Freud, Sigmund
Hysteria; Neuroses; Psychoanalysis
It can still be asked why the nervous system merges into a peculiar
affective state of anxiety under the circumstances of psychic inadequacy
for the subjugation of the sexual excitement? A hint to the answer is as
follows: The psyche merges into the affect of fear when it perceives
itself unable to adjust an externally approaching task (danger) by
corresponding reaction; it merges into the neurosis of anxiety when it
finds itself unable to equalize the endogenously originated (sexual)
excitement. The psyche, therefore, behaves as if projecting this
excitement externally. The affect and the neurosis corresponding to it
stand in close relationship to each other; the first is the reaction to
an exogenous, the latter the reaction to an analogous endogenous
excitement. The affect is a rapidly passing state, the neurosis is
chronic because the exogenous excitement acts like a stroke happening
but once, while the endogenous acts like a constant force. The nervous
system reacts in the neurosis against an inner source of excitement just
as it does in the corresponding affect against an analogous external
one.
IV. THE RELATIONS TO OTHER NEUROSES.
A few observations still remain to be mentioned on the relations of the
anxiety neurosis to the other neuroses in reference to occurrence and
inner relationship.
The purest cases of anxiety neurosis are also usually the most
pronounced. They are found in potent young individuals with a uniform
etiology, and where the disease is not of long standing.
To be sure, the symptoms of anxiety are found more frequently as a
simultaneous and common occurrence with those of neurasthenia, hysteria,
compulsive ideas, and melancholia. If on account of such clinical
mixtures one hesitates in recognizing anxiety neurosis as an independent
unity, he will also have to abandon the laboriously acquired separation
of hysteria and neurasthenia.
For the analysis of the “mixed neuroses” I can advocate the following
proposition: Where a mixed neurosis exists, an involvement of many
specific etiologies can be demonstrated.
Such a multiplicity of etiological moments determining a mixed neurosis
can only come about accidentally, if the activities of a newly formed
injury are added to those already existing. Thus, for example, a woman
who was at all times a hysteric begins to practice coitus reservatus at
a certain period of her married life, and adds an anxiety neurosis to
her hysteria; a man who had masturbated and become neurasthenic, becomes
engaged and excites himself with his fiancée so that a fresh anxiety
neurosis allies itself to his neurasthenia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account