“A certain nobleman went into a far country, to receive for himself
a kingdom and to return.... But his citizens hated him, and sent an
ambassage after him, saying, We will not that this man reign over
us. And it came to pass, when he was come back again, having
received the kingdom.... Howbeit these mine enemies, which would not
that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before
me” (Luke xix. 12 ff.).
“There is little doubt that” this parable “was suggested by
contemporary history. The remarkable feature of the opposing embassy
makes the reference to Archelaus highly probable; and Jericho, which
he had enriched with buildings, would suggest his case as an
illustration” (Plummer). The fact that Archelaus came back with only
a provisional promise of kingship does not detract from the
probability.
Herod’s death was the signal for a national outbreak against his
successor. A riot took place at Passover, [Sidenote: 4 B.C.] and
Archelaus left for Rome to have his title confirmed (Cf. the _Hist.
Atlas_ previously cited, Map 43).
Archelaus then issued a proclamation that all should withdraw to their
homes. So they abandoned the feast and departed, for fear of worse
evils, although in their ignorant way they had shown boldness
enough.[138]
Archelaus then went down to the sea-board with his mother; he took with
him also his friends Nicolaus,[139] Ptolemy and Ptolla.[140] He
committed the entire charge of his family and realm to his brother
Philip. There also sailed with him Salome, Herod’s sister, with her
children, and many of his relations; ostensibly to assist Archelaus to
obtain his kingdom, but in reality intending to oppose him, and in
particular to protest loudly against his proceedings in the
Temple.—_Ant._ XVII. 9. 3 (218-220).
After the departure of Archelaus, Sabinus, the procurator of Judæa,
tries to get possession of Herod’s treasures in the Temple.
A Rival Claimant to the Kingdom
About this time Antipas, another of Herod’s sons, also set sail for
Rome, to make a rival claim to the throne, to which he was instigated to
aspire by Salome’s promises. He claimed that he had a much better right
than Archelaus to the succession, in virtue of his nomination as king in
Herod’s former will, which, in his opinion, had greater validity than
the later codicils. He took with him his mother and the brother of
Nicolaus, Ptolemy, one of Herod’s most honoured friends, and now a
staunch champion of Antipas. But the man who more than any other
prompted him to think of claiming the throne was Irenæus, a professional
speaker, who on account of his reputation for ability had been entrusted
with the administration of the realm. Thus supported, Antipas declined
to listen to those who advised him to make way for Archelaus as the
elder son and the one who had been declared king in their father’s later
will.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account