Sequential Problem Solving: A Student Handbook with Checklists for Successful Critical ThinkingLozo, Fredric B.
Science
Sequential Problem Solving: A Student Handbook with Checklists for Successful Critical Thinking
Lozo, Fredric B.
Critical thinking; Decision making; Problem solving; Study skills
Internal conflicts have a personal nature. By comparing personal
internal conflicts to Aristotle's structure for dramas, these
conflicts can often be recognized. Aristotle's drama structure divided
the play into five acts with a hero, a villain, an external conflict
and climax, and an emotional cleansing involving an internal conflict.
Real life internal conflicts often involve character traits and values
that are easily identified by this method.[5] (Character traits and
values are discussed in the section on interpersonal relationships.)
* * * * *
_Fact Gathering_ in Problem Solving.
The preferred order for gather facts is based on the order of
reliability: library research, asking someone knowledgeable, and
brainstorming.
Facts should be tested for logic, emotional fallacies, and the
credibility of "expert" witnesses. Facts gained from research in a
library are easiest to verify, and other methods of gathering facts
must often be re-verified through library research. Logical and
emotional weaknesses of arguments can often be recognized by the use
of certain fallacy recognition checklists.[6] The most widely used of
the fallacies is the over or under generalization: everyone (all,
without exception, none, never, no one) rode a bicycle when only two
years old.[7]
* * * * *
The more common persuasive fallacies are:
Logic Fallacies.
1. Generalization -- It is raining everywhere. It has not rained
anywhere. (The exception is discounted.)
2. Circular argument -- That team is the best because it is the
greatest. (Similar adjectives describing each other.)
3. Either or fallacy -- Either the city will drill more wells or it
will run out of water. (This ignores the possibility of water
pipelines, river dams, desalinization, etc.)
4. Cause and effect fallacies -- two kinds:
A. Single cause fallacy -- The streets are wet, therefore it has
been snowing. (This discounts other causes like rain.)
B. Guilt by association -- He has a friend that is a Japanese,
therefore he must be Japanese in his soul.
* * * * *
Emotional Fallacies. (These are intended make a person fear loss of
friendship.)[8]
1. Generalization-Everyone is doing it.
2. Snob Appeal -- A special thing for a special group: Heroes
wear only Hot Stuff clothes.
3. Loaded Language -- Emotionally connotative terms of derision: He is
a "Mutt." (Not only a dog but also a worthless cur.)
4. Name Calling -- This is often used to discredit someone.
It is also often a problem evasion rather than a problem solving
strategy that uses:
i. Sarcasm.
ii. Cynicism.
* * * * *
Credibility Fallacies.
Credibility fallacies are those in which uncertified people present
themselves as experts: the famous actor dressed as a doctor
recommending a certain medicine. The actor is not a trained
professional and has no professional credibility.
Fact And Opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account