The narrative before us is one of the most beautiful and touching in the gospel record. It was a saying of Gregory the Great: "Whenever I think of this story I am more inclined to weep over it than to preach upon it." It is just the tale to prompt deep, quiet feeling rather than elaborate disquisition. It contains an illustration in real life of the old promise: "A bruised reed shall He not break, and the smoking flax shall He not quench." It declares the Saviour's matchless sympathy for the sinner, and the most broken-hearted sinner's hope in Him. It teaches these lessons for all time, since in Christ and in His system of Redemption there can be no change. Let us look at the narrative somewhat closely, and may God help us to see in it Christ as the refuge of the lost, and the thankfulness to Him which must possess the soul whom He has saved. When we have said all we can, there will yet remain much more to be felt. Before I proceed, however, let me say that this narrative must not be confounded with another which is in many respects like it, and which has been told by the other evangelists. In both cases, the name of the host is Simon, and in both a woman anoints the Lord Jesus, and wipes His feet with her hair. But the differences are numerous. In this case, the host is a Pharisee living in Galilee, and he looks on Christ with mistrust; in the other case, the host is a healed leper in Judea, bound to Christ by grateful love. In this case, the anointing proceeds from personal and grateful love, and has no other specialty of motive; in the other case, Jesus says: "Let her alone; against the day of my burying hath she kept this." Here, Jesus is blamed by the Pharisee; there, the woman is blamed by the disciples. Pride is the root of Simon's objection; the objection of the disciples springs from selfishness. Here a sinner is pardoned; there a disciple is honoured. Here, in all probability, the woman was Mary Magdalene; there, the woman was the sister of Lazarus. We have no information as to the reason which induced this Pharisee to invite Christ to his house. The verse I have read as a text may obscurely hint to us, perhaps, that he himself had come under some obligation to Jesus, and not feeling any true gratitude, he thought he might acquit himself of his obligation by a compliment of this kind! Or the invitation may have sprung from curiosity, or from vanity, or from ambition. Possibly he may have wished to play the _patron_. Anyhow, we have no sign that he was urged by spiritual considerations. Many men come--if one might so say--_locally_ near to Christ, who have no faith in Him, and no love for Him.