Seven Minor Epics of the English Renaissance (1596-1624)Barksted, William, active 1611
General
Seven Minor Epics of the English Renaissance (1596-1624)
Barksted, William, active 1611
English poetry -- Early modern, 1500-1700; Epic poetry, English; Renaissance -- England
[14] =Shakespeare's Ovid Being Arthur Golding's Translation of the
Metamorphoses=, ed. W. H. D. Rouse (London, 1904; reprinted Carbondale,
Ill. 1961), IV, 67-201; X. 327-605.
[15] Not Orpheus, as stated by Professor Douglas Bush in =Mythology and
the Renaissance Tradition= (Minneapolis, 1932), p. 183.
[16] =Shakespeare's Ovid=, X, 343-346.
[17] Despite these departures from Ovid, the British Museum Catalogue
continues to list this as a "translation" of Ovid's =Metamorphoses=, X.
For a somewhat later example of an actual translation of this tale,
considerably amplified, see James Gresham's (not Graham's, as in =STC=)
=The Picture of Incest, STC= 18969 (1626), ed. Grosart (Manchester,
1876). In idiomatic English, occasionally ornamented with such triple
epithets as "azure-veyned necke" and "Nectar-candied-words," Gresham
expands Golding's Ovid by more than 300 lines. Although he invents a
suitable brief description of Mirrha's nurse, whom he calls "old
trott," and throws in a few erotic tid-bits quite in the spirit of the
minor epic, he never departs from Ovid's story line and never
introduces descriptive detail of which there is not at least a hint in
Ovid.
[18] No. 95 in the edition cited below.
[19] Mary A. Scott, =Elizabethan Translations from the Italian= (Boston,
1916), pp. 20, 144.
[20] =Poems by Richard Linche, Gentleman= (=1596=), ed. Grosart, p. x; =The
Love of Dom Diego and Gynevra=, ed. Arber in =An English Garner=, VII
(Birmingham, 1883), 209.
[21] "The Source of Richard Lynche's 'Amorous Poeme of Dom Diego and
Ginevra,'" =PMLA=, LVIII (1943), 579-580.
[22] William Painter, =The Palace of Pleasure=, IV (London, 1929), 74.
(Actually, "Catheloigne" in Painter.)
[23] =Certain Tragical Discourses of Bandello=, trans. Geffraie Fenton
anno 1567. Introd. by Robert Langton Douglas, II (London, 1898), 239.
[24] Painter, I, No. 40, 153-158.
[25] Painter, I, 156.
[26] Painter, I, 157.
[27] Bush, p. 139.
[28] Two (=Philos and Licia, Amos and Laura=) employ the Marlovian
couplet, two (=Dom Diego= and =The Scourge=) the Shakespearean sixain, and
Barksted's two employ eight-line stanzas, with =Mirrha= rhyming
=_ababccdd_= (the Shakespearean stanza plus a couplet), and =Hiren=
rhyming =_ababbcac_=, a more tightly knit departure from Shakespeare's
stanza. The last, =Pyramus and Thisbe=, suggests its debt to both
masters--or plays both ends against the middle--by employing a 12
(2x6)-line stanza composed of couplets, with the last couplet having a
double rhyme probably designed to echo the concluding couplet of the
Shakespearean sixain.
[29] Thomas Lodge, =Scillaes Metamorphosis= in =Elizabethan Minor Epics=,
ed. Donno, p. 35, stanza 71.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account