Seven Minor Epics of the English Renaissance (1596-1624)Barksted, William, active 1611
General
Seven Minor Epics of the English Renaissance (1596-1624)
Barksted, William, active 1611
English poetry -- Early modern, 1500-1700; Epic poetry, English; Renaissance -- England
Of the seven minor epics included here, three--=A Pleasant and
Delightfull Poeme of Two Lovers, Philos and Licia=, =STC= 19886 (1624);
Dunstan Gale's =Pyramus and Thisbe=, =STC= 11527 (1617); and S[amuel]
P[age's] =The Love of Amos and Laura= (1613)[2]--have not previously
been reprinted in modern times. And of these three, one, =Philos and
Licia=, though listed in the =Short-Title Catalogue=, seems not to have
been noticed by Renaissance scholars, nor even by any of the principal
bibliographers except William C. Hazlitt, who gives this unique copy
bare mention as a book from Robert Burton's collection.[3]
The remaining four books--R[ichard] L[ynche's][4] =The Amorous Poeme of
Dom Diego and Ginevra= published with Lynche's =Diella, Certaine
Sonnets=, =STC= 17091 (1596); William Barksted's =Mirrha The Mother of
Adonis: Or, Lustes Prodegies=, =STC= 1429 (1607), published with =Three
Eglogs= by Lewes Machin; Barksted's =Hiren: or The Faire Greeke=, =STC=
1428 (1611); and H. A's =The Scourge of Venus, or, The Wanton Lady.
With the Rare Birth of Adonis=, =STC= 968 (1613)--have been edited by the
"indefatigable" Alexander B. Grosart in =Occasional Issues of Very Rare
Books= (Manchester, 1876-77), limited to 50 copies each and hence
extremely scarce today.[5] =Dom Diego and Ginevra= was also reprinted by
Edward Arber in =An English Garner=, VII (Birmingham, 1883), 209-240.
With the exception of =Philos and Licia=, these poems are printed in
their approximate order of composition from 1596 to 1613.[6]
AUTHORSHIP
As befits the paucity of their known literary productions, the authors
of these poems have in common chiefly their anonymity, or a degree of
obscurity approaching it. The authors of =Philos and Licia= and of H.
A's =The Scourge= are unknown. Though the authors of the other poems are
known, little is known about them. The mystery of the authorship of
=The Scourge= was compounded in the nineteenth century by its incorrect
attribution to one Henry Austin. Grosart, for example, argued that the
H. A. on the title page and on the address "To the Reader" of the 1614
impression, and the A. H. on the corresponding pages of the 1620
impression, =STC= 970, was the Austin denounced by Thomas Heywood for
stealing his translations of Ovid's =Ars Amatoria= and =De Remedio
Amoris=. Arthur Melville Clark, in correcting this error, pointed out
that these stolen translations of Ovid should not be confused with =The
Scourge=, an original poetic composition based on Book X of a quite
different work by Ovid, =The Metamorphoses=. Clark concluded that "H. A.
or A. H. was probably the editor, not the author, although he may have
made certain corrections and additions, as the title-page of the
second edition states."[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account