Seville: an historical and descriptive account of "the pearl of Andalusia"Calvert, Albert Frederick
History
Seville: an historical and descriptive account of "the pearl of Andalusia"
Calvert, Albert Frederick
Art -- Spain -- Seville; Painters -- Spain; Seville (Spain) -- Description and travel
The reign of the Almohades is the most interesting period in the
history of the city. It was marked by the foundation of Seville’s most
important existing edifices, and by the introduction of a new style
of architecture. Hitherto, what is loosely called Moorish art, had
been native Andalusian art, following Saracenic or Syrian ideals. Of
this first period, the Mezquita at Cordova is the finest monument.
Seville is peculiarly the city of the second, or true, Moorish period.
Byzantine and Oriental influences disappeared and were supplanted by
the African or, more properly, Berber, character. The new conquerors
of Andalusia were a rude, hardy race, and we find something virile
and coarse in their architecture. “Beside the Giralda of Seville,”
remarks Herr Karl Eugen Schmidt, “the columns of the mosque of Cordova
seem small; the pretty halls of the Alhambra have something weak and
feminine.” The weakness of the Almohade builders, as is usually the
case with imperfectly civilised peoples, lay in an excessive fondness
for ornamentation. Señor de Madrazo’s criticism, though severe, is,
on the whole, just. While admitting the beauty of certain of their
innovations, such as the stalactited dome (afterwards carried out
with so much effect at Granada) and the pointed arch, he goes on to
say, “The Almohade architecture displays that debased taste which
is imitative rather than instinctive, and which creates only by
exaggerating forms to a degree inconsistent with the design--differing
from the Mudejar work of the thirteenth to the fifteenth centuries,
which reveals an instinctive feeling for the beautiful in ornament,
which never loses sight of the graceful, the elegant, and the bold, and
which consequently never betrays any aberration. The Almohade style,
in short, at once manifests the vigour of the barbarian civilised
by conquest; the Mudejar style has the enduring character of the
works of a man of taste, wise in good and evil fortune; both are the
faithful expression of the culture of peoples of different origins and
aptitudes.” Elsewhere the same authority observes, “It is certain that
the innovation characteristic of Musulman architecture in Spain in
the eleventh and twelfth centuries, cannot be explained as a natural
mutation from the Arabic art of the Khalifate, or as a prelude to
the art of Granada, because there is very little similarity between
the style called secondary or Moorish and the Arab-Byzantine and
Andalusian; while, on the other hand, it is evident that the Saracenic
monuments of Fez and Morocco, of the reigns of Yusuf Ben Tashfin,
Abdul Ben Ali, Al Mansûr, and Nasr, partake of the character of the
ornamentation introduced by the Almohades into Spain.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account