Sex & Character: Authorised Translation from the Sixth German EditionWeininger, Otto
Philosophy
Sex & Character: Authorised Translation from the Sixth German Edition
Weininger, Otto
Character; Sex; Sex (Psychology); Sexual ethics
Each monad, however, is differentiated from every other monad, and is as
distinct from it as only two things can be. Monads have no windows, but,
instead, have the universe in themselves. Man as monad, as a potential
or actual individuality, that is, as having genius, has in addition
differentiation and distinction, individuation and discrimination; the
simple undifferentiated unit is exclusively female. Each monad creates
for itself a detached entity, a whole; but it looks upon every other ego
as a perfect totality also, and never intrudes upon it. Man has limits,
and accepts them and desires them; woman, who does not recognise her own
entity, is not in a position to regard or perceive the privacy of those
around her, and neither respects, nor honours, nor leaves it alone: as
there is no such thing as one-ness for her there can be no plurality,
only an indistinct state of fusion with others. Because there is no “I”
in woman she cannot grasp the “thou”; according to her perception the I
and thou are just a pair, an undifferentiated one; this makes it
possible for woman to bring people together, to match-make. The object
of her love is that of her sympathy--the community, the blending of
everything.[23]
[23] All individuality is an enemy of the community. This is seen most
markedly in men of genius, but it is just the same with regard to the
sexes.
Woman has no limits to her ego which could be broken through, and which
she would have to guard.
The chief difference between man’s and woman’s friendship is referable
to this fact. Man’s friendship is an attempt to see eye to eye with
those who individually and collectively are striving after the same
idea; woman’s friendship is a combination for the purpose of
match-making. It is the only kind of intimate and unreserved intercourse
possible between women, when they are not merely anxious to meet each
other for the purpose of gossiping or discussing every day affairs.[24]
[24] Men’s friendships avoid breaking down their friends’ personal
reserve. Women expect intimacy from their friends.
If, for instance, one of two girls or women is much prettier than the
other, the plainer of the two experiences a certain sexual satisfaction
at the admiration which the other receives. The principal condition of
all friendship between women is the exclusion of rivalry; every woman
compares herself physically with every woman she gets to know. In cases
where one is more beautiful than the other, the plainer of the two will
idolise the other, because, though neither of them is in the least
conscious of it, the next best thing to her own sexual satisfaction for
the one is the success of the other; it is always the same; woman
participates in every sexual union. The completely impersonal existence
of women, as well as the super-individual nature of their sexuality,
clearly shows match-making to be the fundamental trait of their beings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account