Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative surveyFoster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
General
Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative survey
Foster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
Lesbians in literature; Sex in literature; Women in literature
“After the first flush of acclamation their work was treated with
ever-increasing coldness by the literary world, and there is no doubt
that the discovery that Michael Field was no avatar ... but two
women, was partly responsible.”[1]
The handful of volumes which have been available for inspection seem far
from works of genius; nevertheless, the poems have as much freshness and
lyric charm as those of many other minor writers who are repeatedly
included in anthologies. The plays, though they exhibit careful
historical scholarship, are weighted with moral or feministic message
and seem artificial and heavy. The one that reached the stage in their
own day was an immediate failure.
There is evidence in the luxurious format of their privately printed
volumes, and in the description of the house in Richmond where they
lived after Mr. Cooper’s death, that they were blessed with ample means,
and beyond doubt their thirty-five years of adult life together were
happier than the lives of most Victorian spinsters. They cultivated the
acquaintance of all the surviving nineteenth-century poets, and derived
much excitement from moderate friendships with the aging Browning and
Meredith. But the Victorian era as a whole was disinclined to honor two
“Platonists” as the previous century had done, and their closest friends
were a pair of Royal Academy artists, Charles Ricketts and Charles
Shannon, who lived together near them in a relationship evidently
comparable to their own. That they did not escape disapprobation is
indicated indirectly in several of the entries in _Works and Days_. When
they first recognized Ricketts and Shannon at an art exhibition they
hesitated long before speaking, uncertain how such a gesture might be
received, even though Ricketts had designed the cover for one of their
recent volumes. After attending another “private view” one Sunday
afternoon in 1889, Katherine made much in their journal of being greeted
by Fairfax Murray. “We recognized that he was proud to manifest to the
world that we were his friends.”[2] And in connection with one of their
volumes of verse, _Long Ago_ (1889), based on fragments from Sappho,
Katherine told Browning that “we meant to do no more harm than George
Herbert, when he took a text from Holy Writ and wrote a hymn thereon.”
The harm they were accused of having done is not mentioned.
The relation between the two women is more difficult to analyze than any
so far encountered. Some time before the publication of their first
volume of poems they were moved to a step best described in a later poem
of Katherine’s:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account