Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative surveyFoster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
General
Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative survey
Foster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
Lesbians in literature; Sex in literature; Women in literature
By the time that this drama was written, however, Millay also had
published a number of lyrics of heterosexual inspiration. Indeed, among
the conventionally minded she had gained a quite shocking reputation on
the strength of them, for they antedated the now notorious Twenties.
Many of them are flippant or bitter in comparison to those inspired by
women, and they flaunt inconstancy and promiscuity. See for instance the
sonnets “Oh think not I am faithful to a vow,” “I shall forget you
presently, my dear,”[57] “What lips my lips have kissed ... I have
forgotten,” and “I being born a woman....”[58] In short, these betray
conscious striving toward a masculine sexual standard to match that of
her partners. They remind one that “Vincent” had concealed her sex at
the date of her first publication. A critic, citing in an adult review
the “phenomenal” quality of a _St. Nicholas_ entry Millay wrote at
fourteen, confessed uncertainty whether the poem was written by a boy or
a girl.[59] Fellow poets reading “Renascence” thought it a man’s work,
and a Barnard professor during her brief months there (repairing
entrance requirement deficiencies for Vassar) pronounced “Interim” to be
written in the character of a man.[60] The same viewpoint marks her
libretto for Deems Taylor’s opera, _The King’s Henchman_.
After her marriage in 1923 all of Millay’s published verse was marked by
greater emotional reticence, and if she wrote privately anything
comparable to her earlier variant lyrics the chances are against its
ever being made public. (There has been no providential Reinach to
salvage her reliques for posterity, and it is rumored that censorship is
being exercised. Letters have been admitted to the published volume of
her correspondence which imply some early heterosexual indiscretion,
while all variant traces have been eradicated save a proper name or
two[61] in connection with which the published implications are
unrevealing. To the student of variance, however, they are significant.)
The one notable exception to this general reticence is _Fatal Interview_
(1930), of which Atkins said in 1936 that she, herself,
must be the first post-Victorian critic on record to state in cold
print ... that a still breathing married woman, name and dates given,
has written a poem of extra-marital passion, not as a literary
exercise in purple penmanship, but as an honest record of immediate
experience.[62]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account