Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative surveyFoster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
General
Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative survey
Foster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
Lesbians in literature; Sex in literature; Women in literature
Two years later (1902) a Canadian-American girl of twenty-one published
_The Story of Mary MacLane_, written as a journal covering three months
during her nineteenth year and purporting to be literal autobiography.
Like the comparable “Story of Opal,” printed as authentic by the
_Atlantic Monthly_ in 1920, but partially “debunked” by discerning
critics, it was probably laced with more than a dash of fiction. In its
day it created sufficient sensation to be burlesqued in Weber and
Field’s revue of that year, and sold well enough to allow its author a
half-dozen years in Boston and New York.
Conspicuous in its self-revelation is undying hatred of the father whom
Mary lost at the age of eight.
Apart from feeding and clothing me ... and sending me to school—which
was no more than was due me—I cannot see that he ever gave me a
single thought. Certainly he did not love me, for he was quite
incapable of loving anyone but himself....[7]
Of her mother she says later,
How can one bring a child into the world and not wrap it round with a
certain wondrous tenderness that will stay with it always!... My
mother has some fondness for me—for my body because it came out of
hers. That is nothing—nothing. A hen loves its egg.[8]
Mary feels herself unloved also by the rest of her family—older sister,
older and younger brothers, and stepfather—all of whom are “strictly
practical and material, seeing close human relations as the stuff of
literature, not real life....” She is herself a genius, infinitely apart
from the crude barrenness of Butte, Montana, though she owns to keen
sympathy for women there who are “outside the moral pale.” All this, of
course, is once again the “dark hero complex,” that sense of being
outcast but superior, which has since been so well analyzed by Romer
Wilson in Emily Brontë and others. For 1902, three decades _before_ the
era when parents could do no right, it was fairly strong meat.
As for men, MacLane is certain none can ever rouse or possess her except
the Devil. “He will be incarnate, but he will not be a man.” He will
hurt her, and passion for him will free her from herself, but it will
last only three days, and “there must be no falling in love about it.”
My shy and sensitive soul would be irretrievably poisoned and
polluted. The defilement of so sacred and beautiful a thing as
marriage is surely the darkest evil that can come to a life. And so
everything in me that had turned toward that too bright light would
then drink deep of the lees of death.[9]
It was this devil fantasy upon which Weber and Fields seized, and on the
stage the Dark Gentleman, played by William Collier, fled in terror
before the _enfant terrible_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account