Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative surveyFoster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
General
Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative survey
Foster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
Lesbians in literature; Sex in literature; Women in literature
Since Miss Stein’s novelette remained unpublished for half a century,
MacLane and Ellis would be America’s only representatives in this early
period but for short stories which appeared sporadically. One of
Josephine Dodge Dascom’s _Smith College Stories_ (1900), “A Case of
Interference,” just skirted the variant field. A junior, prominent
because of her literary ability, enters the despised arena of campus
politics to save an unpopular gifted freshman who worships her from
leaving college. A little later the _Ladies’ Home Journal_ published a
slighter college story, “The Cat and the King,” by Jennette Lee, in
which a freshman shams illness in order to join her senior idol in the
infirmary, and is extricated from ensuing complications by a wholly
sympathetic woman physician. These were both written on an adult level.
The only known variant juvenile, _The Lass of the Silver Sword_ by Mary
Constance Du Bois, ran in _St. Nicolas Magazine_ during 1909 and was
published in book form later.[26] Centered about the adoration of a
fourteen-year-old girl for a senior of nineteen in her boarding school,
it was sympathetic but so circumspect as to lack full vitality.
Catherine Wells’s “The Beautiful House” (_Harper’s Magazine_, 1912)
pictures an idyllic relation between two adult artists, for the older
and less feminine of whom the connection ends tragically with the
marriage of the younger woman. Helen R. Hull’s “The Fire” (1918) will be
discussed later with its author’s longer narratives.
It is noteworthy that none of this early fiction records disapproval of
variant experience on the part of either the authors or society. It is
seen as educative and beneficial during the teens, or even in the
following decade for the single woman, and it provides the only
happiness during adolescence for several girls more gifted than their
peers. If in Masefield’s novel its sequel is tragic, jealousy rather
than variance per se is responsible, and Miss Stein condemns the
experience she describes, not as lesbian, but as generally spineless and
unintelligent. In the cases (Miss Stein’s and Miss Richardson’s) where
antipathy or indifference to men is noted, women’s attraction to their
own sex is not responsible, but is rather a concomitant product of
unspecified factors.
Sophistication and Dispute
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account