Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative surveyFoster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
General
Sex variant women in literature : $b A historical and quantitative survey
Foster, Jeannette H. (Jeannette Howard)
Lesbians in literature; Sex in literature; Women in literature
Roy Basler, in his _Sex, Symbolism and Psychology in Literature_,
devotes a long chapter[41] to the poem which is recommended to the
reader for its minute analysis of Coleridge’s skill in handling the
whole episode. As he points out, it is “too realistic psychologically
... for one to avoid an erotic implication.” The remainder of the poem
contains nothing further of variant significance. The spell of
Geraldine’s touch has made it impossible for Christabel to give her
father anything beyond the simplest objective account of how the woman
came there, and the action merely prepares for later events never
written.
Of the content of these three projected “books” we have only a brief
account by Dr. James Gilman, with whom Coleridge lived later while
undergoing treatment for his addiction to opium. The relevant points
follow: Complications force Geraldine to abandon her feminine form and
to assume that of Christabel’s absent lover. In this guise she woos the
girl and gains the father’s consent to a marriage, even though
Christabel is filled with inexplicable loathing for her at the altar.
Had Coleridge carried through this outlined narrative, he could
scarcely, as Basler says, “have avoided even more harrowing suggestions
of a sexual nature” in Geraldine’s disguised courtship. Significant of
her sexual duality are repeated references to her height and her
arrogant bearing.
Basler points out that after 1801, Coleridge’s moral reputation was
precarious because of his opium habit, and that “no man ever feared
calumny more keenly.” Although the poet began _Christabel_ and had the
entire plot worked out at that time, he published none of it for fifteen
years. When it finally appeared, the _Edinburgh Review_ attacked it with
“charges of obscenity” and “implications of personal turpitude,” while
“parodies and vulgar continuations of the poem made the most of leering
improbabilities.” The dread of further personal attack discouraged
Coleridge from completing the work, and no other English poet seems to
have approached the subject of variance for nearly a half century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account