She hath done what she could: A Discourse addressed to the Ratepayers of St. Marylebone, urging the adoption of The Public Libraries Act, 1855Feilde, Matthew
History
She hath done what she could: A Discourse addressed to the Ratepayers of St. Marylebone, urging the adoption of The Public Libraries Act, 1855
Feilde, Matthew
Library legislation -- Great Britain
“I exhort the people of England—you who are here present to-night—all
who shall read my words to-morrow, I exhort them to make this a great
question. Your fathers would have made it a great question: they
would have maintained, and did maintain their rights; and you are
recreant and unworthy children of theirs if you surrender them in
your generation.”
What cares Earl Derby, with his fifty proxies, whether he throws the
country into inextricable confusion? {19} What cares a haughty
aristocrat for Mr. Gladstone? His great superiority of intellect—his
undaunted courage—his noble conscientiousness, are so many thorns in his
side, and it is clear that certain members of both Houses, and envious
EX-Chancellors, (as Disraeli, or that renegade sinecurist, Spring Rice,
Lord Monteagle—a servant of the Crown, yet working against the Crown—with
an office of £2,000 as Comptroller of the Exchequer, money wrung from a
heavily taxed Public) dislike our honest Finance Minister. Need I remind
you the genius MR. GLADSTONE has displayed as a Financier is a crime in
their eyes. To drive the STATE Coach at all hazards, what cares LORD
DERBY if the wheels of his chariot knock down the great Commoner? What
does such a titled usurper care for offering gross insults to the
CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER? To OBSTRUCT, to offer every impediment to
the spread of knowledge by means of the Penny NEWSPAPER—that great
political Intelligence—is the delight of this chieftain and his
retainers. You then turn round and most insolently taunt the Poor with
their want of knowledge and improvidence, with their hazy and uncertain
political ideas. You tempt the poor man with bribes, and complain of his
dependence in his exercise of the Franchise, and contemptuously enquire
“what will he do with it?”
I know of no dishonour, no meanness to be compared with this. You are
astute enough in diverting attention from the REFORM Bill by unfriendly
criticisms on NAPOLEON, and by the distraction of Foreign Affairs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account