American literature -- History and criticism; English literature -- History and criticism
Boileau had created such an atmosphere about
Molière and Racine; Sainte-Beuve had attempted, but unsuccessfully, to
do the same for the poets of the romantic renaissance. His failure was
due in part to a certain lack of impressiveness in his own personality,
but still more to the notions of individual licence which lay at the
very foundation of that movement. There is a touch of real pathos in his
superb tribute to Boileau:
Let us salute and acknowledge to-day the noble and mighty harmony
of the _grand siècle_. Without Boileau, and without Louis XIV.,
who recognised Boileau as his Superintendent of Parnassus, what
would have happened? Would even the most talented have produced in
the same degree what forms their surest heritage of glory? Racine,
I fear, would have made more plays like _Bérénice_; La Fontaine
fewer _Fables_ and more _Contes_; Molière himself would have run
to _Scapins_, and might not have attained to the austere eminence
of _Le Misanthrope_. In a word, each of these fair geniuses would
have abounded in his natural defects. Boileau, that is to say, the
common sense of the poet-critic authorised and confirmed by that
of a great king, constrained them and kept them, by the respect
for his presence, to their better and graver tasks. And do you
know what, in our days, has failed our poets, so strong at their
beginning in native ability, so filled with promise and happy
inspiration? There failed them a Boileau and an enlightened
monarch, the twain supporting and consecrating each other. So it
is these men of talent, seeing themselves in an age of anarchy
and without discipline, have not hesitated to behave accordingly;
they have behaved, to be perfectly frank, not like exalted
geniuses, or even like men, but like schoolboys out of school. We
have seen the result.
Nobler tribute to a great predecessor has not often been uttered, and in
contrast one remembers the outrage that has been poured on Boileau's
name by the later poets of France and England. One recalls the scorn of
the young Keats, in those days when he took licence upon himself to
abuse the King's English as only a wilful genius can:
Ill-fated, impious race!
That blasphemed the bright Lyrist face to face,
And did not know it,--no, they went about,
Holding a poor decrepit standard out
Marked with most flimsy mottoes, and in large
The name of one Boileau!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account