American literature -- History and criticism; English literature -- History and criticism
I insist on this because the danger to-day is in the sacrifice of
the writers and poets whom I will call the moderate. For a long
time they had all the honours: one pleaded for Shakespeare, for
Milton, for Dante, even for Homer; no one thought it necessary to
plead for Virgil, for Horace, for Boileau, Racine, Voltaire, Pope,
Tasso,--these were accepted and recognised by all. To-day the
first have completely gained their cause, and matters are quite
the other way about: the great and primitive geniuses reign and
triumph; even those who come after them in invention, but are
still naïve and original in thought and expression, poets such as
Regnier and Lucretius, are raised to their proper rank; while the
moderate, the cultured, the polished, those who were the classics
to our fathers, we tend to make subordinate, and, if we are not
careful, to treat a little too cavalierly. Something like disdain
and contempt (relatively speaking) will soon be their portion. It
seems to me that there is room for all, and that none need be
sacrificed. Let us render full homage and complete reverence to
those great human forces which are like the powers of nature, and
which like them burst forth with something of strangeness and
harshness; but still let us not cease to honour those other forces
which are more restrained, and which, in their less explosive
expression, clothe themselves with elegance and sweetness.
And this love of the golden mean, joined with the long wanderings of his
heart and his loneliness, produced in him a preference for scenes near
at hand and for the quiet joys of the hearth. So it was that the idyllic
tales of George Sand touched him quickly with their strange romance of
the familiar. Chateaubriand and the others of that school had sought out
the nature of India, the savannahs of America, the forests of Canada.
"Here," he says, "are discoveries for you,--deserts, mountains, the
large horizons of Italy; what remained to discover? That which was
nearest to us, here in the centre of our own France. As happens always,
what is most simple comes at the last." In the same way he praised the
refined charm of a poet like Cowper, and sought to throw into relief the
purer and more homely verses of a Parny: "If a little knowledge removes
us, yet greater knowledge brings us back to the sentiment of the
beauties and graces of the hearth." Indeed, there is something almost
pathetic in the contrast between the life of this laborious recluse,
with his sinister distrust of human nature, and the way in which he
fondles this image of a sheltered and affectionate home.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account