Traumatic neuroses; War neuroses; World War, 1914-1918 -- Health aspects; World War, 1914-1918 -- Veterans -- Mental health
It is an axiom in medicine that correct diagnosis is the indispensable
preliminary to the rational and intelligent treatment of disease. This
fundamental principle is universally recognised in dealing with bodily
affections; but it is the primary object of this book to insist that
_it is equally necessary to observe the same principle in the case of
mental illness_.
It may seem ironical to stress this elementary consideration, but it
is notorious that accurate diagnosis is too often ignored in cases
of incipient mental disturbance. It is idle to pretend that such a
procedure is unnecessary, or to urge in extenuation of the failure to
search for causes that many patients recover under the influence of
nothing more than rest, quiet, and ample diet.
Many mild cases of illness, whether bodily or mental, may and do
recover even if undiagnosed or untreated. But on the other hand many
mild cases get worse; and it is the primary duty of the physician
correctly to diagnose the nature of the trouble and to give a
prognosis—to decide whether the illness is mild or severe. Some of the
most serious cases of incipient mental trouble are those of patients
who do not seem to be really ill, and are easily overlooked by a
visiting physician. They are quiet and inoffensive and display no
obvious signs of the insidious processes that are at work in them. But
all the time they may be, and often are, brooding over some grievance
or moral conflict, worrying about their feelings, misinterpreting them
and gradually systematising these misunderstandings until they become
set as definite delusions or hallucinations. If, acting on the belief
that it is bad to talk about a patient’s worries, the physician leaves
such a man alone, he is clearly neglecting his obvious duty. For the
whole trouble may be due to some trivial misunderstanding which he
could easily correct.
In the severer forms of mental disease, precise diagnosis is even more
intimately related to treatment than in the case of bodily illness.
For when a patient’s illness is recognised as some bodily affliction,
such as pneumonia or appendicitis, certain general lines of treatment
are laid down as soon as the appropriate label has been found for
the complaint, though, in the case of the latter illness, there is
added the further problem of whether or not surgical interference is
indicated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account