Traumatic neuroses; War neuroses; World War, 1914-1918 -- Health aspects; World War, 1914-1918 -- Veterans -- Mental health
His reason tells him quite correctly, and far too often for his
personal comfort, that had he not given, or failed to carry out, a
particular order, certain disastrous and memory-haunting results
might not have happened. It tells him, quite convincingly, that in
his present state he is not as other men are. Again, the patient
reasons, quite logically, but often from false premises, that since
he is showing certain symptoms which he has always been taught to
associate with “madmen,” he is mad too, or on the way to insanity. If
nobody is available to receive this man’s confidence, to knock away
the false foundations of his belief, to bring the whole structure
of his nightmare clattering about his ears, and finally, to help
him to rebuild for himself (not merely to re-construct for him) a
new and enlightened outlook on his future—in short, if he is left
alone, told to “cheer up” or unwisely isolated, it may be his reason,
rather than the lack of it, which will prove to be his enemy. And
nobody who has observed the hyperæsthesia to noises and light in the
nerve-hospital, nobody who has seen the effects upon the patients of
a coal dropping unexpectedly out of the fire, will have much respect
for the phrase, “lost his senses.” There exist, of course, cases of
functional blindness, deafness, cutaneous anæsthesia and the rest, but
the majority of the nerve patients show none of these disorders and
recovery from them is often rapid.
In a word, it is not in the intellectual but in the _emotional_ sphere
that we must look for terms to describe these conditions. These
disturbances are characterised by instability and exaggeration of
emotion rather than by ineffective or impaired reason.[2] And as we
shall see later, in the re-education of the patient, the physician is
compelled continually to take this fact into account.
As we have pointed out, every nerve-stricken soldier presents a case
by itself. Slavish adherence by the physician to one of the classical
names or labels used in diagnosis usually spells failure. The patient
must be approached _without prejudice_, and the doctor who wishes to
be of real help to him must make up his mind to examine and ponder
over the sufferer’s mental wounds with as much, nay, even more—care and
expenditure of time than would be given to physical injuries. A mere
cursory inspection in the course of the formal ward visit is a solemn
farce, if it pretends to be a serious attempt to cure the mentally
afflicted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account