Shell-shock and other neuropsychiatric problems : $b Presented in five hundred and eighty-nine case histories from the war literature, 1914-1918Southard, Elmer Ernest
History
Shell-shock and other neuropsychiatric problems : $b Presented in five hundred and eighty-nine case histories from the war literature, 1914-1918
Southard, Elmer Ernest
War neuroses; World War, 1914-1918 -- Medical care; World War, 1914-1918 -- Psychological aspects
Neurologically, there was a partial spastic paralysis of the right
thigh which could be abducted, could be flexed to 120°, and showed
some power in the quadriceps. There was also a spastic paralysis of
the right arm, but the shoulder girdle movements were not impaired.
There was a slight weakness on the right side of the face. There was no
anesthesia anywhere.
The deep reflexes were increased on the right side, Babinski on right,
flexor contractures of right hand, extensor contractures of right
leg, abdominal and epigastric reflexes absent, pupils active, tongue
protruded in straight line.
Fluid: slight increase in protein. W. R. + + +
The Board of Pension Commissioners ruled that the condition had been
aggravated _by_ service (not “_on_ service”).
_Re_ general paresis, Fearnsides suggested at the Section of Neurology
in the Royal Society of Medicine early in 1916, that in all cases of
suspected Shell-shock the Wassermann reaction of the serum should be
determined, and went on to say that cases of so-called Shell-shock with
positive W. R. often improve rapidly with antisyphilitic remedies.
Duration of neurosyphilitic process important _re_ compensation.
=Case 8.= (FARRAR, personal communication, 1917.)
A Canadian of 36 enlisted in 1915, served in England, and was returned
to Canada in February, 1917, clearly suffering from some form of
neurosyphilis (W. R. positive in serum and fluid, globulin, pleocytosis
108).
There is no record of any disability or symptom of nervous or mental
disease at enlistment. The first symptoms were noted by the patient in
May, 1916, six months or more after enlistment. The case was reviewed
at a Canadian Special Hospital, October 11, 1916, by a board which
reported:
“The condition could only come from syphilitic infection of three
years’ standing” (a decision bearing on compensation); but the general
diagnosis remained:
“Cerebrospinal lues, =aggravated by service=.”
The picture which the medical board regarded as of at least three
years’ standing was as follows:
History of incontinence, shooting pains, attacks of syncope, general
weakness, facial tremor, exaggerated knee-jerks, pupils react with
small excursion. Speech and writing disorder, perception dull, lapses
of attention, memory defect, defective insight into nature of disorder,
emotional apathy.
1. Was the conclusion “aggravated by service” sound? On
humanitarian grounds the victim is naturally conceded the
benefit of the doubt. But it is questionable how scientifically
sound the conclusion really was.
2. Could the condition come only from syphilitic infection of
at least three years’ standing? Hardly any single symptom in
this case need be of so long a standing; yet the combination
of symptoms seems by very weight of numbers to justify the
conclusion of the medical board.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account