Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
History
Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)
Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
Shipbuilding -- History; Ships -- History
It was at the battle of Zierikzee, in 1302, where the Flemings fought
against the French, the Dutch and the Genoese, that, according to the
old Florentine historian Villani, the superiority of the broad-beamed
vessels of the North Sea, over the galleys, was first felt. The Count
of Flanders had fitted out, for this battle, eighty ships or “coques”,
built in accordance with the maritime demands of the place. (Villani
says: _ottantia navi, overo cahi, al medo di quello mare_.) According
to this historian it was also the first time that vessels of this kind
had to be fought.
The battle of Zierikzee was the cause, from this time on, of giving
more and more attention, in the Mediterranean, to the building of
broad-beamed ships. Besides, necessity forced it. The Crusades brought
about more frequent relations with the peoples of the North against
whom defense must needs be had.
In the beginning, the people from the North called upon the Genoese
and others along the shores of the Mediterranean to transport the
Crusaders to Palestine. The route by the Mediterranean became thus
known to them; but they very soon undertook to build ships themselves
so as to escape from the exorbitant transportation charges of the
Italians. Nevertheless, Venice, Genoa, etc. remained the principal
warehouses; and many ships were still built there, especially for
France. Philip the Handsome, in his struggle against Edward I of
England, in 1295, and Philip of Valois, in his war against Edward III,
in 1337, both made use of Genoese vessels. (~La Croix~, p. 92.)
Furthermore, as ~Jal~ has written (_Archéologie Navale_, Vol. II, p.
352), it can be granted with certainty that the vessels built in the
French ports of the Mediterranean, were identical with those used in
Italy. The mutual relations between maritime peoples and their common
interests inevitably brought about these imitations. Venice yielded
nothing to Genoa; Genoa was close on the heels of Pisa and, in the
improvements made in shipbuilding, this last city did not allow herself
to be out-done by Barcelona, Marseilles or Constantinople.
Under these circumstances, the writer just quoted was right, then, in
saying: “The basin of the Mediterranean had, therefore, but one navy,
at least so far as the principal vessels were concerned; it is so
to-day and it was certainly so in ancient times.” I add also for my
part that the characteristic differences offered by types of vessels
among themselves, have undergone no change in the course of ages
and this applies not only to the basin of the Mediterranean, but to
shipbuilding in general.
These old types, however, are not to be sought among the large vessels,
but rather among the small ones and, particularly, among fishing smacks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account