Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3) — John Shaqi
Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
History
Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)
Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
Shipbuilding -- History; Ships -- History
The types of the Norse vessels have, however, not been changed as the
result of contact with the South. The extraordinary life of the Vikings
and their continual piracies justify the conclusion that the merchant
ship was not improved among them, but rather among the peoples engaged
in a more regular trade. There is really, in my opinion, no cause
for astonishment that this development should have taken place in the
North-Western part of Europe. There are some even who claim that the
vessel “busse”, generally in use during the Middle Ages, came to us
from Normandy and dates from the beginning of the XIth century. In
order to support this claim, they take their stand on the fact that the
word “busse” appears first at about this time in the Chronicles.
J. Steenslup has called attention to a people of seamen called the
“Butsecarlas” (mentioned in the old Anglo-Saxon Chronicles of the year
1066 and in the book of Florent Wigorniensis, dating from 1052), who
occupied the coasts of Hasting and Yorkshire. This writer also calls
attention to the second part of the word, which belongs to the Norse
tongue, while the word “buza” occurs frequently in the Old Norse and
the Old Swedish, near the XIIIth century, and means a boat of sharply
curved form. This word, however, is of Romana origin: it corresponds,
so it said, to the Old French _buse_ or _buce_ (dating from about
1080); hence it is considered that the vessel “buce” is originally from
Normandy.
This, however, does not seem to be so sure. It has been shown, as a
matter of fact, that the same shapes of ships have been preserved for
ages even though under other names.
The fact that the word _buse_ is used for the first time about the year
1050 is, therefore, no proof that the type of vessel in question only
appeared at this time. I am rather inclined to think that the type
under consideration was already in existence, but that it was named
_buse_ or _buze_ in Normandy only toward 1050 and, probably, after
having undergone a few unimportant changes.
Shipbuilding was imported from the Baltic into the Netherlands by the
most ancient inhabitants of this country, the Frisians and the Saxons,
who then developed it aside from any foreign influence.
In this respect, the quotation from Witsen, which appears on page 47 of
his well known work, becomes really important: _De Vriezen komt de lof
toe van de herstelde scheepsbouw in Nederland, zoo de meeste schryvers
willen_[7]. The question is, indeed, that of a development of its own
in the North-Western part of Europe; the special and identical forms,
still found to-day, to a great extent, from Denmark to Belgium, are
sufficient proof of the fact.
This is why the Baltic may be spoken of broadly as the Northern centre,
in opposition to the Mediterranean Sea as the Southern centre. The
development of shipbuilding had this Northern centre as its starting
point and finally reached its highest mark in the Netherlands. France
and England came later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account