Siberia (Russia); Siberia (Russia) -- Description and travel
I watched Kalmikoff. A young man, said to have been born in 1884, he is
scarcely more than five feet tall, slight of build, with bluish eyes,
and a small mustache. He wore a saber, and a small pistol slipped into
the loop of a strap hanging from his belt, rather than a holster--a
pistol so small as to suggest a derringer. His aspect was proud and
military, but he did not make the figure one would expect to see head
of several provinces of Cossacks. However, he is reputed to be very
brave, a good commander, and a dashing leader of irregular horse, such
as the Cossacks are. I heard that in the charge, if any of his men
attempted to ride ahead of him, he promptly cut them down with his
saber.
He had made himself a Major General, it was said, and we understood
that he was civil and military governor of the Ussuri district. His
claim to the title of Ataman I never understood fully; some said he was
hereditary chief of all the Cossacks of that section, and some said
he had been elected to that position by the Cossacks, while others
maintained that he had set himself up as the local prince, with no more
to back his authority than a small band of partizans who were organized
into a military staff, chiefly engaged at that time in executing
everybody who opposed his rule.
Already, reports were coming down to our headquarters that protests
were being made by the civilians of Khabarovsk, that many people were
being executed by Kalmikoff’s orders without trial, and that the
victims were merely such personal enemies, or such persons as might
question Kalmikoff’s authority.
But our position of “non-interference” with Russian affairs, made
it difficult for our staff to either advise Colonel Styer, or for
Colonel Styer to take any action other than to make official inquiry
of Kalmikoff as to the executions. Not that I infer Colonel Styer or
our staff found it difficult to obey orders, but Kalmikoff happened
to be one of the “Russian people,” and how could an American officer
interfere with Kalmikoff’s executions without interfering with a
Russian?
And at that time, Kalmikoff’s exploits in fighting the Bolshevist
forces were uppermost in the minds of some of our officers, and it
appeared that what Kalmikoff did at that time was considered by some
subordinate officers to be indicative of his abilities as a ruler. I
heard one young officer say while I was in Khabarovsk the first time:
“The Ataman is a smart fellow. He sits at his desk in headquarters, and
when a couple of prisoners are brought in, he looks at them with those
snapping little eyes of his, and waving his hand, says: ‘take ’em out
and shoot ’em.’”
That, to some minds, may be proof that a general or a ruler is great;
but I could not see that government by firing squads by Kalmikoff is
any better than government by firing squads under the Czar. It all
depends pretty much upon who is going to be shot, and what the person
is to be shot for.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account