Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successors — John Shaqi
Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successorsLodge, Oliver, Sir
Science
Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successors
Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Electric waves; Telegraph, Wireless
Prof. Minchin, whose long and patient work in connection with
photo-electricity is now becoming known, and who has devised
an instrument more sensitive to radiation than even Boys’
radiomicrometer, in that it responds to the radiation of a star while
the radiomicrometer does not, found some years ago that some of his
light-excitable cells lost their sensitiveness capriciously on tapping,
and later he found that they frequently regained it again while Mr.
Gregory’s Hertz-wave experiments were going on in the same room.
These “impulsion cells,” as he terms them, are troublesome things for
ordinary persons to make and work with--at least I have never presumed
to try--but in Mr. Minchin’s hands they are surprisingly sensitive to
electric waves.[11]
The sensitiveness of selenium to light is known to everyone, and Mr.
Shelford Bidwell has made experiments on the variations of conductivity
exhibited by a mixture of sulphur and carbon.
Nearly four years ago M. Edouard Branly found that a burnished
coat of porphyrised copper spread on glass or ebonite, diminished
its resistance enormously, from some millions to some hundreds of
ohms, when it was exposed to the neighbourhood, even the distant
neighbourhood, of Leyden jar or coil sparks. He likewise found that a
tube of metallic filings behaved similarly, and that both recovered
their original resistance on shaking or tapping. Mr. Croft exhibited
this fact recently at the Physical Society. M. Branly also made pastes
and solid rods of filings, in Canada balsam and in sulphur, and found
them likewise sensitive.[12]
[11] _Phil. Mag._, Vol. XXXI., p. 223.
[12] E. Branly, _Comptes Rendus_, Vol. CXI., p. 785; and Vol. CXII., p.
90.
With me the matter arose somewhat differently, as an outcome of the
air gap detector employed with an electroscope by Boltzmann (Fig. 16).
For I had observed in 1889 that two knobs sufficiently close together,
far too close to stand any voltage such as an electroscope can show,
could, when a spark passed between them, actually cohere; conducting an
ordinary bell-ringing current if a single voltaic cell was in circuit;
and, if there were no such cell, exhibiting an electromotive force
of their own sufficient to disturb a low resistance galvanometer
vigorously, and sometimes requiring a faintly perceptible amount of
force to detach them. The experiment was described to the Institution
of Electrical Engineers in 1890,[13] and Prof. Hughes said he had
observed the same thing.
[13] _Journal_ Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1890, Vol. XIX.,
pp. 352-4; or “Lightning Conductors and Lightning Guards,” pp. 382-4.
[Illustration: FIG. 16A.--Receiver in Syntonic Jar Experiment, with
Knob Coherer and Tapper-back (_cf._ Fig. 4).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account