Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successors — John Shaqi
Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successorsLodge, Oliver, Sir
Science
Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successors
Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Electric waves; Telegraph, Wireless
Observe how simple the production and detection of Hertz waves are
now. An electrophorus or a frictional machine serves to excite them; a
voltaic cell, a rough galvanometer, and a bad contact serves to detect
them. Indeed, they might have been observed at the beginning of the
century, before galvanometers were known: a frog’s leg or an iodide of
starch paper would do almost as well.
A bad contact was at one time regarded as a simple nuisance, because
of the singularly uncertain and capricious character of the current
transmitted by it. Hughes observed its sensitiveness to sound waves,
and it became the microphone. Now it turns out to be sensitive
to electric waves, if it be made of any oxidisable medal (not of
carbon),[16] and we have an instrument which might be called a
micro-something, but which, as it appears to act by cohesion, I at
present call a coherer. Perhaps some of the capriciousness of an
anathematised bad contact was sometimes due to the fact that it was
responding to stray electric radiation. (See Appendix III., pp. 109 and
111.)
[16] FitzGerald tells me that he has succeeded with carbon also. My
experience is that the less oxidisable the metal, the more sensitive
and also the more troublesome is the detector. Mr. Robinson has now
made me a hydrogen vacuum tube of brass filings, which beats the
coherer for sensitiveness. July, 1894.
The breaking down of cohesion by mechanical tremor is an ancient
process, observed on a large scale by engineers in railway axles and
girders; indeed, the cutting of small girders by persistent blows of
hammer and chisel reminded me the other day of the tapping back of our
cohering surfaces after they have been exposed to the uniting effect of
an electric jerk.
_Receiver in Metallic Enclosure._
If a coherer is shut up in a complete metallic enclosure, waves cannot
get at it, but if wires are led from it to an outside ordinary
galvanometer, it remains nearly as sensitive as it was before (nearly,
not quite), for the circuit picks up the waves and they run along the
insulated wires into the closed box. To screen it effectively, it is
necessary to enclose battery and galvanometer and every bit of wire
connection; the only thing that may be left outside is the needle of
the galvanometer. Accordingly, here we have a compact arrangement of
battery and galvanometer coil and coherer, all shut up in a copper box
(Fig. 19C). The galvanometer coil is fixed against the side of the box
at such height that it can act conveniently on an outside suspended
compass needle. The slow magnetic action of the current in the coil
has no difficulty in getting through copper, as everyone knows: only
a perfect conductor could screen off that; but the Hertz waves are
effectively kept out by the sheet copper.
[Illustration: FIG. 19C.--Protected Detector. A is an occasional wire
passing through shuttered aperture. E is a lead tube enclosing leading
wires, as in Fig. 21.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account