Significant Achievements in Space Bioscience 1958-1964 — John Shaqi
Significant Achievements in Space Bioscience 1958-1964United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Science
Significant Achievements in Space Bioscience 1958-1964
United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Biology; Space flight
The question "Is life limited to this planet?" can be considered on a
statistical basis. Although the size of the sample (one planet) is
small, the statistical argument for life elsewhere is believed by many
to be very strong. While Mars is generally considered the only other
likely habitat of life in our solar system, Shapley ([ref.35]) has
calculated that more than 100 million stars have planets sufficiently
similar in composition and environment to Earth to support life. Of
course, yet unknown factors may significantly reduce or even eliminate
this probability.
SPACECRAFT STERILIZATION
The search for extraterrestrial life with unmanned space probes requires
the total sterilization of the landing capsule and its contents.
Scientists agree that terrestrial organisms released on other planets
would interfere with exobiological explorations (refs.
[ref.36]-[ref.43]). Any flight that infects a planet with terrestrial
life will compromise a scientific opportunity of almost unequaled
proportions. Studies on microbiological survival in simulated deep-space
conditions (low temperature, high ultraviolet flux, and low dose levels
of ionizing radiation) indicate that these conditions will not sterilize
contaminated spacecraft (refs. [ref.44]-[ref.48]). Furthermore, many
terrestrial sporeformers and some vegetative bacteria, especially those
with anaerobic growth capabilities, readily survive in simulated Martian
environments (refs. [ref.49]-[ref.54]). It has been estimated that a
single micro-organism with a replication time of 30 days could, in 8
years of such replication, equal in number the bacterial population of
the Earth. This potential could result not only in competition with any
Martian life, but in drastic changes in the geochemical and atmospheric
characteristics of the planet. To avoid such a disaster, certainly the
first, and probably many succeeding landers on Mars, must be
sterile—devoid of terrestrial life ([ref.55]). Since the space
environment will not in itself kill all life aboard, the lander must
leave the Earth in a sterile condition.
The sterility of an object implies the complete absence of life. The
presence of life or the lack of sterility may be proven; but the absence
of life or sterility cannot be proven, for the one viable organism that
negates sterility may remain undetected. Many industrial products which
must be guaranteed as sterile cannot be tested for sterility in a
nondestructive manner. A similar situation exists in determining the
sterility of a spacecraft. Certification of sterility—based on
experience with the sterilizing process used, knowledge of the kinetics
of the death of micro-organisms, and computation of the probability of a
survivor from assays for sterility—is the only accurate approach to
defining the sterility of such treated items.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account