Sir Thomas More, or, Colloquies on the Progress and Prospects of SocietySouthey, Robert
Philosophy
Sir Thomas More, or, Colloquies on the Progress and Prospects of Society
Southey, Robert
More, Thomas, Saint, 1478-1535; Social problems
_Montesinos_.--If it be your aim to prove that the savage state is
preferable to the social, I am perhaps the very last person upon whom any
arguments to that end could produce the slightest effect. That notion
never for a moment deluded me: not even in the ignorance and
presumptuousness of youth, when first I perused Rousseau, and was
unwilling to feel that a writer whose passionate eloquence I felt and
admired so truly could be erroneous in any of his opinions. But now, in
the evening of life, when I know upon what foundation my principles rest,
and when the direction of one peculiar course of study has made it
necessary for me to learn everything which books could teach concerning
savage life, the proposition appears to me one of the most untenable that
ever was advanced by a perverse or a paradoxical intellect.
_Sir Thomas More_.--I advanced no such paradox, and you have answered me
too hastily. The Britons were not savages when the Romans invaded and
improved them. They were already far advanced in the barbarous stage of
society, having the use of metals, domestic cattle, wheeled carriages,
and money, a settled government, and a regular priesthood, who were
connected with their fellow-Druids on the Continent, and who were not
ignorant of letters. Understand me! I admit that improvements of the
utmost value have been made, in the most important concerns: but I deny
that the melioration has been general; and insist, on the contrary, that
a considerable portion of the people are in a state, which, as relates to
their physical condition, is greatly worsened, and, as touching their
intellectual nature, is assuredly not improved. Look, for example, at
the great mass of your populace in town and country--a tremendous
proportion of the whole community! Are their bodily wants better, or
more easily supplied? Are they subject to fewer calamities? Are they
happier in childhood, youth, and manhood, and more comfortably or
carefully provided for in old age, than when the land was unenclosed, and
half covered with woods? With regard to their moral and intellectual
capacity, you well know how little of the light of knowledge and of
revelation has reached them. They are still in darkness, and in the
shadow of death!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account