Flower, William Henry, 1831-1899; Zoologists -- Great Britain -- Biography
By no means the least important part of Flower’s work in connection with
the museum of the College of Surgeons was the compilation and publication
of the first two volumes of the _Catalogue of Osteological Specimens_ the
first, dealing with man alone, issued in 1879, and the second, written
with the aid of his assistant, Dr. J. G. Garson, and treating of the
other members of the mammalian class, in 1884. The importance of these
works consists in the fact of their being a very great deal more than
mere catalogues of the contents of one particular museum. They are,
on the contrary, systematic treatises, embodying the views of their
chief author on such important subjects as zoological nomenclature and
classification, and on the best method of arranging museums which include
specimens of the dentition and osteology of both living and extinct
animals. They accordingly deserve notice at some considerable length, not
only on this account, but as forming a record of the great changes Flower
introduced into the museum at this period under his charge.
It appears that the first printed list of the contents of the museum was
published in the year 1831. In a few years, however, it became evident
that a work of a more ambitious nature was required; and in January 1842,
the then Conservator, Professor Owen, presented a report to the Council,
on the supreme advantage to be gained by combining in the proposed new
Catalogue both the recent and the fossil osteological Catalogues. Acting
on this, the Committee of Council resolved that such a Catalogue should
be prepared and published, and the duty of doing this was thereupon
confided to Mr. Owen.
For some reason or other, this excellent and far-seeing resolution
was not acted upon in its entirety; and although catalogues were in
due course compiled by Owen and published, the specimens belonging to
animals still extant were entered in volumes quite distinct from these
devoted to fossil bones and teeth; while the two series of specimens were
likewise kept apart in the museum itself. “Hence,” as Flower subsequently
observed, “each series was incomplete, and required reference to the
other for its perfect illustration and comprehension.” These defects
were remedied during the administration of Flower, who not only arranged
the extinct specimens in their proper position among those belonging
to recent animals, but likewise followed the same admirable plan in
drawing up the Catalogues. Later on, as we shall see in the sequel, he
endeavoured to introduce the same scheme into the Natural History Museum,
but was prevented by the force of circumstances from carrying his views
into full effect, although a small step in the right direction was
accomplished.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account