Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His DiscoursesWoolston, Thomas
Religion
Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His Discourses
Woolston, Thomas
Gibson, Edmund, 1669-1748; Jesus Christ -- Miracles -- Early works to 1800; Smalbroke, Richard, 1672-1749
"Our Ancestors then, who unquestionably detected the Fraud, were in
the right on't to prosecute with Severity, the whole Party
concern'd in it: And if they had aveng'd the Wickedness of it upon
_Lazarus_ as well as they did upon _Jesus_, I should have commended
them for it. Whether such a monstrous Imposture, as was this
pretended Miracle, happily discover'd does not call aloud for
Vengeance and most exemplary Punishment; and whether any Nation of
the World would suffer the like with Impunity, let any Man judge.
"For all the Reports of your Gospels, it is unnatural to hate a
miraculous Healer of Diseases; and there must be somewhat supprest
about the Inveteracy of the _Jews_ to _Jesus_, or his healing
Power, if it was so great as is imagined, must have reconciled them
to him: But that they should hate not only _Jesus_ for raising the
dead, but the Person rais'd by him, is improbable, incredible, and
impossible.
"If Historians can parallel this Story of the Malignity of the
_Jews_ towards _Jesus_ and _Lazarus_ upon such a real Miracle, with
any Thing equally barbarous and inhuman, in any other Sect or
Nation; we will acknowledge the Truth of it against our ancient
Nation: Or if such Inhumanity, abstractedly consider'd, be at all
agreeable to the Conceptions any one can form of Human Nature in
the most uncivilis'd and brutish People, we will allow our
Ancestors, in this Case, to have been that People.
"Was such a real and indisputable Miracle, as this of _Lazarus_ is
supposed, to be wrought at this day in Confirmation of
Christianity, I dare say, it would bring all us _Jews_, to a Man,
into the Belief of it: And I don't think it possible, for any
People to be so begotten, byass'd, and prejudiced, as not to be
wrought on by it. Or if they would not part with their Interests
and Prejudices upon it, they would have more Wit and Temper, than
to break forth into a Rage against all or any of the Persons
concern'd in it. And, for my Life, I can entertain no worse
Thoughts of our old Nation.
"Supposing God should send an Ambassador at this day, who, to
convince Christians of the Mischiefs and Inconvenience of an
_Hireling Priesthood_, should work such a Miracle as was this of
_Lazarus_'s Resurrection, in the Presence of a multitude of
Spectators; how would your _Bishops_ and _Clergy_ behave themselves
upon it? Why, they would be as mute as Fishes; or if they did fret
and grieve inwardly for the Loss of their Interests; yet they would
have more Prudence (ask them else,) than to show their Anger
openly, and persecute both _Agent_ and _Patient_ for it. Wherefore
then are they so censorious and uncharitable as to preach and
believe another Notion and Doctrine of our Ancestors?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account