Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
“I have ventured to publish the following observations on Milton’s
imitation of the moderns; having lately fallen on four or five modern
authors in Latin verse, which I have reason to believe Milton had
consulted in composing his Paradise Lost. The novelty of the subject
will entitle me to the favour of the reader, since I in no way intend
unjustly to derogate from the real merit of the writer. The first
author alluded to was Jacobus Masenius. He was a professor of rhetoric,
in the Jesuits’ College, at Cologne, about 1650, and he wrote Sarcotis,
in five books; which, said he, in the preface, is not so much a
complete model, as a rough draught of an epic poem. Milton follows
this author tolerably closely through the first two books. In it Adam
and Eve are described under the single name of Sarcothea, or human
nature, whose antagonist, the infernal serpent, is called Lucifer. The
infernal council, or Pandemonium, Lucifer’s habits, and the fight of
the angels, are too obvious not to have been noticed; Milton’s exordium
appears to have been almost directly taken from Masenius and Ramsay.”
Lauder goes on to state that the Paradise Lost was taken from a farce,
called Adamo Perso, and from an Italian tragedy, called Paradiso Perso;
and that even Milton’s poem itself was said to have been written for a
tragedy.
“Having procured,” continues he, “the Adamus Exul of Grotius, I found,
or imagined myself to find the first draught, the _prima stamina_,
of this wonderful poem; and I was then induced to search for the
collateral relations it might be supposed to have contracted in its
progress to maturity.” The Adamus Exul of Grotius was never printed
with his other works, though it passed through four editions; and it
was by very great labour that Mr. Lauder was at last able to get a copy
from Gronovius, at Leyden. Milton is charged with having literally
translated, rather than barely alluded to, this work.
The severe affliction which Milton endured, in the loss of sight,
obliged him to have recourse to filial aid, in consulting such authors
as he had occasion to refer to; and Lauder, wishing to prove that he
feared detection and exposure, asserted that he taught his daughters
only to _read_ the several languages, in which his authorities were
written, confining them to the knowledge of words and pronunciation,
but keeping the sense and meaning to himself.
Apparently feeling a momentary shame at his conduct, Lauder, in
a kind of apology, added, “As I am sensible this will be deemed
most outrageous usage of the divine, immortal Milton, the prince
of English poets, and the incomparable author of Paradise Lost, I
take this opportunity to declare, that a _strict regard to truth
alone_,[12]--and to do justice to those authors from whom Milton has
so liberally gleaned, without acknowledgment,--have induced me to
make this attack upon the reputation and memory of a person hitherto
so universally applauded and admired for his incomparable poetical
abilities.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account