Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
It first occurred to Dr. Douglas to search for those authors, from
whom Lauder asserted that Milton had borrowed his ideas. Many were
scarce, and not to be found; but he succeeded in getting one,
Staphorstius, a Dutch poet and divine, who, says Lauder, “never dreamt
the prince of English poets would condescend to plume himself with
his--Staphorstius’--feathers;” and he quotes certain passages in proof
of this assertion,--an entire quotation of thirty-two lines, besides
shorter ones. “I was,” says Dr. Douglas, “at a loss where to turn
for lines; for it is remarkable, that through his whole work, Lauder
omits to tell his readers where the quotations are to be found: with
great labour, however, I found some allusion to the subject, and
also, with great surprise, discovered that eight lines quoted as from
Staphorstius have no existence in that author; and which eight lines
are in Lauder’s Essay printed in italics, as having the strongest
resemblance to those in Paradise Lost, and it will be impossible for
Lauder to clear himself from the charge of having corrupted the text of
Staphorstius, by interpolating the eight lines not to be found there.
A more curious circumstance still is, that this interpolated passage
is taken from a Latin translation of Paradise Lost itself, made by one
Hogæus, or Hog, printed in the year 1690, without the variation of a
single word: it must be thought therefore extremely hard that Milton
should be run down as a plagiarist for having stolen from himself,
yet this is strictly the case. Hog translated the Paradise Lost into
Latin: Lauder interpolates some of Hog’s lines in Staphorstius, and
then urges these very lines as a demonstration that Milton copied him.
There is equal testimony to prove that Lauder interpolated Phineas
Fletcher, and others, in the same way; but the most extraordinary part
of the forgery is yet to be mentioned: this interpolating critic has
even forged Milton himself, and interpolates the Paradise Lost, however
ridiculously improbable this may seem. In 1747, Lauder makes his first
appearance as the Zoilus of Milton, in the Gentleman’s Magazine, where,
to prove that Milton had copied from the Adamus Exul of Grotius, he
quotes, professedly from the Paradise Lost, one line and a half,
beginning
‘And lakes of living sulphur ever flow,
And ample spaces.’
“After the most careful search, I can safely pronounce that the above
line and a half have no existence in the Paradise Lost.”
From the difficulty of rebutting Lauder’s evidence against Milton,
he had acquired some merit in the eyes of men of learning, which
procured him the countenance of the great, and encouraged him to open a
subscription for the publication of a new edition of those authors who,
according to him, had held the torch to Milton.
Upon the publication of Dr. Douglas’s remarks on Lauder, the
booksellers who had undertaken his work, thought proper to prefix the
following notice to each copy of it:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account