Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
The Abbé Barthelemi, taught by experience, was very careful how he
exposed to visiters the rarities in the French cabinet of medals, of
which he was the keeper; for in his account of the duties of his office
he says, “Such a depository as this cabinet of medals cannot safely
be made public; several persons might put their hands on them at one
time, and it would be easy to carry them off, or substitute such as are
spurious or common. I had no other resource, after I had got rid of the
groups, but to examine the shelves at which they had been looking.”
Vaillant, the celebrated numismatist, when pursued at sea by Algerine
pirates, is said to have swallowed a whole series of Syrian kings. When
he landed at Marseilles, he hastened to his friend, physician, and
brother antiquary, Dufour, groaning horribly, with the treasures in his
belly. Dufour was only anxious to know, whether the medals were of the
higher empire; Vaillant showed him two or three, of which nature had
relieved him: a bargain was immediately struck, and the coins recovered.
The almost universal ignorance in Europe of the Chinese alphabet, and
written character, has been the cause of some curious mistakes in
deciding on the merits of certain coins. So little was a _professor_ of
Chinese, at Rome, versed in the language he professed to know, that he
is said, by Mr. Pauw, to have mistaken some characters found on a bust
of Isis for Chinese; which bust and characters were afterwards proved
to be the work of a modern artist of Turin, made after his own fancy.
In Great Britain, we have, till recently, known still less of the
Chinese language and literature than on the Continent. “It is not many
years since,” says Mr. Barrow, “that one of the small copper coins of
China, stamped in the reign and with the name of the late Tchien-lung,
was picked up in a bog in Ireland, and, being considered as a great
curiosity, was carried to an indefatigable antiquary, whose researches
have been of considerable use in investigating the ancient history and
language of that island. Not knowing the Chinese character, nor their
coin, it was natural enough for him to compare them with some language
with which he was acquainted; and the conclusion he drew was, that the
four characters on the face were ancient Syriac, and that the reverse
appeared to be astronomical or talismanic characters, of which he
could give no explanation. The Mantchoo Tartar characters of another
coin he supposed to signify _p_, _u_, _r_, which he construed into
sors, or lot; and it was concluded, that these coins must either have
been imported into Ireland by the Phœnicians, or manufactured in the
country; in which case the Irish must have had an oriental alphabet. In
either case, these medals,” it was sagely observed, “contribute more to
authenticate the ancient history of Ireland than all the volumes that
have been written on the subject.”
CHAPTER XIII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account