Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
The eyes are not the only part of the head in which miraculous
appearances have been supposed to be manifested. In 1593, it was
reported that a child of seven years old, in Silesia, having shed
its teeth, a double tooth had been replaced by one of gold. This
phenomenon soon brought a number of learned men into the field, to
dissertate upon the wonder. Horst, more generally known under his
Latinized name of Horstius, who was a professor of medicine, and really
a man of abilities, wrote in raptures upon the subject. According
to his idea, the production of the tooth was partly a natural and
partly a miraculous event, and was intended by Heaven to console the
Christians for the perils to which they were exposed from the Turks.
How consolation was to be derived from such a source, it would not
be easy to discover. Horst was followed by Martin Ruland, another
physician, who published a treatise called “Nova et omni Memoriâ
omnino inaudita Hist. de Aureo Dente,” &c. Two years after Ruland had
given his tract to the world, the opinions which it broached were
controverted by Ingesteterus; and were immediately defended, in another
dissertation, by Ruland. Lastly, the pen was taken up by Libavius, an
eminent chemist and physician, the first proposer of the transfusion
of blood. Unhappily, all this labour and erudition were thrown away.
Some one had, at last, the good sense to institute an inquiry as to the
reality of the miracle; and, to the great discomfort of the literary
and non-literary believers, it was discovered that the tooth was gilt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account