Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
At the present day of intellectual advancement, this story of the size
of Pallas, and of the lamp whose contumacious flame, well befitting
such a giant, exceeds all belief, however gravely stated; yet the time
was, when, instead of exciting contemptuous laughter, it was implicitly
credited. The lamp in the temple of Jupiter Ammon was reported by
the priests to have burned continually, yet it consumed less oil
each succeeding year; though burning in the open air, neither wind
nor water could extinguish it. A similar lamp also burned in honour
of Venus. Trithemius obliges his readers with two long receipts for
the artificial manufacture of these lamps, yet seems to doubt their
efficacy.
The _possibility_ of such eternal lamps being made in Egypt has been
attributed to the existence of the bituminous wells or fountains, from
which the learned in those days laid secret canals or pipes to the
subterranean caves, where, in a convenient place, they set up a lamp
with a wick of asbestos. It seems, indeed, to have been thought a great
desideratum in the arts to invent a perpetual lamp for the companion of
the dead as a complimentary illumination to the manes of the departed,
or from some foolish desire to strike wonder, in after times, in some
carnal beholder, unwittingly violating the tomb; the accounts of such
appear to have been generally believed authentic up to the end of the
seventeenth century; the utilitarian age we live in is content to
possess a perpetual locomotive fire for those above ground.
The art of mimicry, in its modern sense though confined to a mere
imitation of manners, in former times, by the excellence of its action,
imposed on the imaginations of the spectators, and persuaded them
into a belief of the reality of what was represented, even as it were
against conviction.
The endeavour of one or more individuals to express or relate any
story by mere action, was carried to much greater perfection among the
ancients than now appears to be possible. According to Lucian, a single
dancer or mime was able to express all the incidents and sentiments of
a whole tragedy or epic poem by action, accompanied by music, and the
fable of Proteus he seemed to think meant no more than that he was an
accomplished pantomime. The education of a mime required, he says, his
whole life to make himself master of his profession; he must know the
past, the present, and what is to come; in short, the spectator must
_understand_ the dancer though dumb, and _hear_ him though silent.
Lucian mentions a famous mime, who played Ajax the madman so well, and
raged in such a way that one would have said he did not counterfeit,
but was mad in reality. Timocrates, a tutor in philosophy, and who from
conscientious motives had declined being present at such plays, by
accident seeing a pantomime, cried out, “What admirable sights have I
lost by a philosophical modesty!” and ever afterwards attended them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account