Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
For some time after the event, the newspapers were filled with
squibs and epigrams. Among the advertisements in ridicule of the
bottle-conjuror’s, one of the best purported to be from “the
body-surgeon of the Emperor of Monœmungi.” He thus terminated the
description of his budget of wonders: “He opens the head of a justice
of peace, takes out his brains, and exchanges them for those of a calf;
the brains of a beau, for those of an ass; and the heart of a bully,
for that of a sheep; which operations render the persons more rational
and sociable creatures than ever they were in their lives.”
In the next instance of imposture which occurred, those who were misled
could hardly be considered as blameworthy, the circumstances being
such as to account for their erroneous judgment. The case to which
allusion is here made, was that of Elizabeth Canning, in the year 1753.
This female, who was about eighteen years of age, after having been
absent twenty-eight days, returned home in a squalid and apparently
half-starved condition. The story which she told was that, as she was
proceeding at night from her uncle’s to the house of the person with
whom she lived as servant, she was attacked by two men, in Moorfields,
who first robbed her, gave her a blow on the temple, and then dragged
her along, she being part of the time in fits, till they reached a
house of ill-fame, kept by Susannah Wells, at Enfield Wash.
On her arrival there, she was accosted by a gipsy, named Mary Squires,
who asked her if she would “go their way; for if she would, she should
have fine clothes.” Supposing that Squires alluded to prostitution,
Canning replied in the negative; Squires, upon this, ripped up the
lace of her stays with a knife, took away the stays, and thrust her
into a back room like a hayloft, the window of which was boarded
inside. In that room she was imprisoned for twenty-seven days; her
only subsistence being a scanty portion of bread, some water, and a
small mince-pie, which she chanced to have in her pocket. At last, she
bethought her of breaking down the board, after which she crept on a
penthouse, whence she dropped on the ground. She then made the best of
her way home.
Universal pity was excited by the tale of her sufferings, and a
subscription was raised for her. The most violent public indignation
was expressed against the two criminals; and, while this ferment was
at its height, Wells and Squires were brought to trial. The evidence
of Elizabeth Canning was corroborated by that of Virtue Hall, and by
various circumstances, and the jury found both of the prisoners guilty.
Squires was condemned to death, and Wells was ordered to be branded,
and imprisoned for six months.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account