Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
When the appointed hour arrived, “the spirit was very seriously
advertised, that the person to whom the promise was made of striking
the coffin, was then about to visit the vault, and that the performance
of the promise was then claimed. The company, at one, went into the
church, and the gentleman to whom the promise was made, went, with one
more, into the vault. The spirit was solemnly required to perform its
promise, but nothing more than silence ensued. The person supposed to
be accused by the ghost then went down, with several others, but no
effect was perceived. Upon their return they examined the girl, but
could draw no confession from her. Between two and three she desired,
and was permitted, to go home with her father.”
This want of punctuality in the ghost gave a fatal blow to its
reputation. Even the most besotted of the believers were staggered
by it. A flimsy attempt was therefore made to restore the ghost’s
credit, by asserting that the coffin and corpse had been removed,
which, of course, had prevented the spirit from giving the signal;
but on examination they were found to be safe in the vault. Stricter
precautions were now taken to guard against deception being practised
by the girl; her bed was slung like a hammock, in the middle of the
room, and she was closely watched. Driven to her last shifts, she
contrived to secrete, but not unseen, a bit of board previously to her
being put to bed, and having, as she thought, secured the necessary
materials for carrying on the trick, she ventured to declare that she
would bring the ghost at six the next morning. In the morning she
accordingly began to make the accustomed sounds, and, on being asked if
she had in the bed any wood to strike upon, she positively denied the
fact. The bed-clothes were then opened, the board was found, and this
simple process annihilated the Cock Lane Ghost.
Mr. Kent, the accused person, had, in the mean while, proved his
innocence, by certificates from the physician and apothecary who
attended upon the deceased female. The base attack upon his character
appears to have been prompted by revenge. While lodging with Parsons
he had lent him some money, which, after much forbearance, he was
compelled to recover by a suit at law. The malignant offender, however,
did not escape punishment; he, with others who had lent themselves to
his imposture, being ultimately brought to trial, and found guilty of a
conspiracy.
In 1778, the Stockwell ghost, as it was denominated, spread terror in
the village from whence it derived its name, and was for some time a
subject of general conversation and wonderment. Its pranks have been
described in Sir Walter Scott’s amusing “Letters on Demonology and
Witchcraft,” and consequently it is unnecessary to dwell upon them here.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account