Sketches of social life in IndiaBuckland, C. T. (Charles Thomas)
History
Sketches of social life in India
Buckland, C. T. (Charles Thomas)
British -- India -- Social life and customs; India -- Social life and customs
In the Indian hierarchy H.E. the Commander-in-Chief of India comes next
in rank and position to H.E. the Viceroy and Governor-General. But
although to all military men “the Chief” is naturally the most important
personage professionally, it is seldom that “the Chief” and his
_entourage_ make a very deep impression on the social life of the
country. There is a sort of military court-circle whilst the Chief
resides at his summer quarters at Simla, where he holds periodical
levees, and gives dinner-parties and picnics, and sometimes a ball, but
that is chiefly to his official friends and acquaintances. When the
Chief descends to Calcutta, he occupies the house assigned to him in
Fort William, and thereby unintentionally assumes a sort of exclusive
position against non-official society. It is not every merchant or
barrister or other civilian who has time or courage to face all the
sentries, and cross all the drawbridges of the fort, which hedge the
divinity of the Chief. The fort is a sort of large and ingenious
rat-trap, in which there is one cardinal rule—that you must not retrace
your steps, or go out by the gate through which you entered. Sentries
bristle at every corner, sometimes English, sometimes native soldiers;
all evidently full of aversion to stray visitors. So that when you have
at last scaled the Chief’s staircase and written your name in his
visiting-book, under the supervision of a good-looking A.D.C., you make
your retreat with considerable satisfaction, and with a feeling of
profound relief as soon as you find yourself again outside the precincts
of the fort. The official position of the Chief is also somewhat
anomalous, as he is a member of the Viceroy’s Council, although there is
also a Military member of the Council, whose function it is to advise
the Viceroy on military matters, and thus apparently to keep the Chief
under a sort of control. Theoretically it may be presumed that the Chief
should be at the head of his army, wherever it is engaged in war. This
was actually the case when Lord Gough was Commander-in-Chief in the
great campaigns in the Punjab, when the Sikh army threatened our
existence. And still more so was it the rule during the mutinies of
1857–58, when Lord Clyde, as Commander-in-Chief, shared all the perils
and labours of those brave men who then reconquered India. But in later
times, and also before the mutinies, it was not always so. It is a
matter of tradition that Sir William Gomm was the best man at Simla at
the interesting game of cup and ball, there being only one civilian who
could, but would not, beat him at it. In the days of Sir William
Mansfield his excessive zeal in the domestic economy of his household
led to scandals and a court-martial, which has become only too famous in
military history. When Lord Napier of Magdala was Chief, the state of
India was generally peaceful; and although the late genial
Commander-in-Chief would gladly have taken the command in person in the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account